this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
1000 points (100.0% liked)

196

17907 readers
4 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 68 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Raising non-human animals ends up taking more plants anyway because they eat a lot of feed who's energy is mostly lost. So if one were concerned with plants, eating plants directly results in fewer plants being killed

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

If your goal is to minimize the overall harm to plants through your own consumption the most ethical thing to eat is people.

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 year ago

Billionaires 🤤

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

In glad we got to the bottom of this. People. People is the right answer, everyone.

That's a load off my mind! Let's start a company. Maybe we can name it after what we're saving. Something like... Soylent green?

[–] leds@feddit.dk 2 points 1 year ago

Only if they are consenting?