this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
129 points (94.5% liked)

Dungeons and Dragons - Memes and Comics

3896 readers
1 users here now

A community for Dungeons and Dragons Memes and Comics

/c/DnD Network Communities

Rules (Subject to Change)

"Title" - [Comic Name]

e.g. "Krak of Dawn" - [Swords Comic]

*Does not apply to memes

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

That sure seems like chaotic neutral or maybe neutral evil. Chaotic evil always came across to me as being evil for the lulz

[–] zloubida@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] snooggums@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

True neutral wouldn't harm others for their own benefit. Saying someone would do anything with no regard for morality implies they are willing to harm others.

Good goes out of their way to help others.

Neutral doesn't go out of their way to help, but also doesn't harm others.

Evil is willing to harm others.

[–] zloubida@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Thanks! I thought that neutral was not being interested about consequences for others, but it looks like I misunderstood.

[–] sparky1337@ttrpg.network 3 points 2 years ago

I guess the only real argument is that “acting in their own self interest” is quite selfish and moderately evil. So I guess it comes down to the context of the selfishness that’s being exhibited. I feel like there is much more room for interpretation there.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

You're mistakening it with chaotic stupid.

[–] sparky1337@ttrpg.network 4 points 2 years ago

No idea who to credit, stole it off of Reddit months ago.