this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)

UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1428 readers
1 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.


New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide


Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.


Community Spotlight

Featured Posts and User Investigations


Useful Links


Community Rules


Other Communities

!uapmemes@lemmy.world


If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Thank you for providing the source.

[–] moosh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s frustrating that neither Nolan or Loeb can talk about what they’ve seen but makes sense that they need to finish analyzing and publish first. That said, I’m really curious what it was.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I share your frustration. I'm sure they are waiting for the peer review process, which is the correct way to do this if you intend to bring the scientific community fully into the fold.

[–] moosh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

To quote Schitt’s Creek, just fold them in!

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It sounds like Nolan is talking about a CE5 thing to me.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I got a similar vibe as well, however, I'll suspend judgement until more information is revealed.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

“CE5” has a lot of baggage, but it’s easy shorthand. Regardless of the baggage, I’m open to the idea consciousness is mixed into the soup that is UAP and a deeper understanding of the universe.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That sums up my thoughts on it as well.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I'm curious whether the alleged UAP recording that Garry Nolan mentions is the same one that Avi Loeb refers to in this clip.

[–] bquintb@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago
[–] spaceape@lemmy.nrsk.no 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I've chosen to be skeptical of Garry Nolan due to his history both working together with CIA and his work in the UFO field. I didn't know about the Defence and Space company Copernicus Space Corporation, but seeing it's ran by ex-military and establishment profiles... I guess I have to distance myself from these elements of the UFO/UAP discussion.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I believe he was initially approached to look into and study individuals who encountered UAP as he had the only equipment to do so. I'm less skeptical of Garry as he's approaching this from a scientific lens and publishing papers to be peer reviewed.