this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
0 points (50.0% liked)

guns

1469 readers
1 users here now

Keep it civil.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I hope this isn't out of context, also I don't want to "own the libs" or something here, I'm actually interested.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BaldProphet@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, I think it's mostly fear. There are practical reasons to own a gun and be familiar with its use and maintenance, but there are people who have varying levels of fear of weapons on a spectrum from simple discomfort to full on hoplophobia. The same people seem to be generally uncomfortable with being responsible for their own safety, and prefer to live in areas where government agencies are at hand to deal with any kinds of emergencies they may have.

It's the "don't do this, get an adult" mentality extending into adulthood. Once you're an adult, the next level of authority to shunt personal responsibility onto is the government.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Honestly, I think it's mostly fear.

Rightly so, because you could get shot just for coming across some idiot who's having a bad day.

There are no "practical" uses for a gun that come up often enough in people's lives to outnumber the needless death from misuse, or purposeful murder.

Since 2007, there have been less than 500 justifiable homicides per year in the US. And that includes all means of defense. So it's a myth that gun owners are somehow more responsible for their own safety. People just aren't using guns for self defense. You know what they are using them for? Murder.

So the people who defend gun ownership are the ones shunting personal responsibility to protect themselves and their communities.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/251894/number-of-justifiable-homicides-in-the-us/

[–] JackiesFridge@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Along the lines of "fear" I would also add that ubiquitous gun ownership is a large reason for the militarisation and overzealous violence in American police departments. Since anybody could be bristling with guns, the police approach many situations armed for the worst. This makes nobody safer.

[–] BaldProphet@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

Anybody could be bristling with guns since long before the militarization of police in America.

[–] BaldProphet@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

Nah, man. The police have no obligation to protect me, and even if they did, they can't get to me fast enough.

Private weapon ownership (of guns or any other weapons) is inseparable from the human right of self-defense.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Besides shootings? You’re kidding right? That’s like asking “why don’t people like cancer? (Except for the chemo and death part)”

[–] venoft@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

With a knife (or other manual weapon) you have to be trained, lucky or prepared to kill even a single person, with a gun any person can shoot a whole school. It's too much power for some people. Plus you add range to weapons, making it even more deadly and unpredictable (collateral damage, crossfire, etc).

If you set those cons against the pros of "it's fun to sometimes target practice" then it's clear the better option is to ban them, like most countries do. Most people aren't against the actual mechanical contraption known as guns, they're against the fear a shooting can happen to them, their loved ones, or other innocents.

And in terms of protecting yourself from people who do have guns: guess what, in countries where guns are banned 99% of the bad guys also don't have them.

[–] grayman@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In no particular order...

  1. Many men are total pussies and would never consider self defense to the point of killing someone something they would do.
  2. Somewhat contradictally, people don't trust themselves with a gun, so therefore, they don't trust others with guns.
  3. Feminism. Feminism raises mothering to a societal level. Women want everyone to be protected and safe via the a motherly govt overlord. Women intrinsically desire equal outcome. That requires communism. So any means to achieve that. Like authoritarianism.
  4. The rise of Marxism and authoritarianism. Many people want to be told what to do. That only works on a broad scale if the people who refuse are unarmed.
  5. Ignorance. Cognitive dissonance. Narcissism. Lack of critical thinking skills. Inability to set feelings aside and consider things logically.
  6. Brainwashing. There's about 3 generations that have grown up with commie public schools telling them guns are bad. I've converted quite a few democrats from gun fear to fun by just taking them shooting and covering the $40 worth of ammo they use up.
[–] sxan@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

OK. There's no way you're not a troll, but (2), I take issue with. I own guns and am pro gun control, and (2) is bullshit because I'm the only person I trust with one. The rest of you crayon-eating assholes, I wouldn't trust with scissors.

I also take issue with (5), because it's only dumb bastards who are unable to understand basic math enough to notice that, globally, murder rates are highly correlated with firearm (and especially, handgun) ownership.

(6) assumes that a reasoned position is a result of fear, which is because that's how you react to the world, and so believe this is true for everyone. It's ok; it's a common failing of the human character, but you're in luck, because it's easy to mature out of.

I own guns, but if we get reasonable gun control laws in this country, I'll be OK with it because all y'all obviously don't know your ass from your elbow and keep shooting each other. I'll be ok also because I haven't made guns my identity, and I have other hobbies.

You gave the troll away when you threw feminism in there. That was too over-the-top baiting, and it came out of nowhere. However, the dig at Marxism was pretty well played, given how many far-left there are on Lemmy. That was chef's kiss.

[–] bi_tux@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I could debate this with you, but you don't even understand the mastermind above, because you're an evil freedom hating commie