this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
145 points (98.7% liked)

Games

38883 readers
963 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

Platform specific

Game specific

Language specific

Others

PM a mod to add your own

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IBNobody@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Part of me thinks that it's not a consumer facing choice but one of cost savings. I bet they have to pay a licensing fee to continue using Denuvo.

[–] kostel_thecreed@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 years ago

Yeah they do. It's quite pricy iirc.

[–] visor841@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

I think that's exactly right. I think there is a one-time cost they could pay, but it's a lot more, so they just didn't bother.

[–] lorty@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 years ago

And since the objective is to "protect" release sales, taking it out a few months later makes sense.

[–] helloharu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Has to be. There’s always going to be a point in a games post-release lifecycle where the cost is just not worth it anymore. Shame these decisions always seem to be based on cost and not what’s right for the consumer.

[–] rDrDr@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Glad I didn't buy it during the summer sale. Now I can hopefully get it for less without paying the Denuvo tax.