this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
222 points (98.3% liked)

interestingasfuck

1827 readers
1 users here now

Please go to !interestingshare@lemmy.zip

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's a statue in Dachau concentration camp of an emaciated man that reads something like: "In memory of the dead and a warning to the living".

It seems we have ignored both warnings.

[–] Winter8593@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Wait there was a nuclear test less than a year ago?

Edit: Wikipedia says the most recent test was on 2017/09/03, ~~making this photo taken on 2018/04/01~~

Edit 2: I found the article this photo is from with more context. TL:DR it was reset back in 2022 bc the US conducted two clandestine tests.

[–] macarthur_park@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t call the US tests “clandestine”. They’re subcritical, meaning they don’t generate any nuclear yield. They also report when they do these in the annual NNSA reports.

[–] flicker@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was gonna say, if clandestine, how on clock?

[–] weker01@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

They learned of it after it happened per the article.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting, they were “sub critical” tests. I mean that really shouldn’t count…puts them on par with actual detonations (which Russia is clearly prepping to do soon with tactical nukes).

[–] weker01@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Why shouldn't they count? It's literally testing a nuclear weapon. The clock does not say: "Time since the last detonation of a nuclear weapon".

Edit: But one could argue that nuclear weapons get tested all the time without any kind of detonation. These should count too IMHO.

Edit: just read another article on the tests. They happen to design new weapons with them which makes them not tests to see if the nukes still work like I thought.

[–] macarthur_park@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Why shouldn't they count? It's literally testing a nuclear weapon.

It’s not considered a nuclear weapon test under the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, so I think it’s fair to argue the clock shouldn’t be reset for a subcritical test.

[–] TheTetrapod@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're gonna feel reeeaaal silly when they run out of digits in... ~200 years.

[–] Kalladblog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's an optimistic outlook. Given the drastically shifting political landscape, do you really think the clock will still be standing in 200 years?

[–] Senseless@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

If it is they probably need to reset those numbers.

[–] i_ben_fine@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Looks like this picture was taken in early 2018.