this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
207 points (94.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43810 readers
1 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So my company decided to migrate office suite and email etc to Microsoft365. Whatever. But for 2FA login they decided to disable the option to choose "any authenticator" and force Microsoft Authenticator on the (private) phones of both employees and volunteers. Is there any valid reason why they would do this, like it's demonstrably safer? Or is this a battle I can pick to shield myself a little from MS?

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Crisps@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

At what point can you tax deduct your phone as a business expense?

[–] sovietknuckles@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Your employer might use MS Authenticator but still let you do call or SMS 2FA. If you use a VOIP number, it won't be vulnerable to SIM card swapping attacks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If your company is enforcing geographic location as a security qualifier then MS Authenticator can poll your device. Also you can use push authentication with the MS suite.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (8 children)

What is your concern about installing MS Authenticator.

I mean I can understand the principle of being forced to install anything on your phone.

But just stepping into the practical for a second: What do you worry will happen by installing this app to your phone?

[–] Martin@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I'm not concerned per se and I definitely applaud the MFA requirement. I mean I hate MS and don't like apps I don't need, and I don't trust them, but as others pointed out this would mostly just be whiny. That's why I asked for reasons why restricting users to MS Authenticator would be preferable. If it's more secure or technically way easier and thus cheaper to maintain then fine, I'll find an acceptable way to comply. If not, then it's them who are whiny and I'd rather make the case to let us use whatever authenticator we already have installed.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But MS Authenticator isn’t a normal 6-digit Authenticator; it scans your Face ID (or finger print) and in many cases (like my work) it can be support password less accounts (relying only on something you have and something you are).

And in regard to your point that you don’t want to install apps you don’t need, it sounds like you do in fact need this app.

πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

I'm guessing they never mentioned that it tracks your location? That's why they insist on using it not any of the other bullshit.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] franklin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

When setting up the authentication when it asks you to set up Microsoft authenticator there should be a drop-down at the bottom of the page that says use another option that will allow you to use a phone call or text message as your chosen method of authentication.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yoz@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

If you don't care about the money you get paid every fortnight then go ahead. Nobody cares! For employers , you are just a number and for you ,employer is the means to get paid.

If you don't need the money then fuck it.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Do like a friend of mine. He has a 15 dollar a month phone(mint mobile) that he uses for all his job related bullshit. Its all it does and he has no personal accounts on it at all. It kinda sucks that they insist on him using his own equipment for it but its the cheapest way to keep them out of his personal life.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] w2tpmf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

...it won't let me edit my other comment but I wanted to add that YES using MFA is demonstratively far more safe than any password you can set.

With a multi factor enabled you could literally give your password out and people could not access your account without being able to complete that second layer of security.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

I know Google has a way to "force" you to only use their app, and that's strictly enforced for personal MFAs (I haven't verified that recently), I didn't have that kind of trouble not using the MS one, but I'm not sure my org was as strict as yours on that "force MS" option.

we have o365 and while i do have the authenticator, you should also be able to add a phone number or email address for text/email codes instead of the authenticator (i know my coworker doesn't have the authenticator but gets codes to her sms)

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

You have the right not to use your personal hardware for work, and the employer must provide the necessary equipment to accomplish your job.

Ask if you could get a hardware token (ie: Yubikey Security Key) instead of using Microsoft Authenticator to fulfill the security requirements. It's low cost and doesn't require a subscription unlike a cellphone plan.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LostAndSmelly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I am in IT and I feel like I speak for the industry we don't care. Some of my customers have regulators who make arbitrary and capricious decisions with a minimal understanding of infosec but we have to keep the customer compliant.

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί