mp3

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 9 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm just happy to have another Star Trek show to watch. I'll at least give it a chance to prove itself before hating it.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 11 points 23 hours ago (2 children)
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

At least they covered that 😬

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The part that worries me is what happens when the glasses batteries are empty. Do they get fall back to "long-distance / myopia" mode so that you can still see at at distance and able to drive?

I love tinkering with gadgets, but sometimes the manufacturers of these tech-based version forget to cover the basics before enhancing it with tech.

A good example are smartwatches. They can be filled with sensors, but they need to at least do one thing well, and that is to show time reliably.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's like signing a contract, you have only yourself to blame if the contract sucks but didn't read it before putting your signature on it.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Personally I just hoard the giveaway games.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hello, can we speak?

We are seeing more and more Lemmy.ca users being banned for speaking out

Do you mind pointing out specific cases where a ban was unjustified? When I look at the modlog (which is accessible to everyone) I only see one recent ban that could be related by one of our admins, and the reason was "inciting violence". We can review further if it was a mistake.

If there were bans by other admins or moderators in other communities outside of lemmy.ca, it's not in our jurisdiction so you'd have to take it with the mods of these communities or admins of these instances.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

When citizens are accused of a crime, they are given the presumption of innocence as afforded by due process. When there is an incident involving law enforcement, politicians and activists immediately condemn those involved and are scrambling for sound bites.

Law enforcement officers wield a significant amount of power over civilians, and should be held to a higher level of standard and scrutiny. You know, with great powers comes great responsibilities.

Maybe one reason why there is systematic condemnation when a law enforcement official is involved in a crime is because the population is increasingly mistrustful because of incompetent officers that tarnishes your profession by acting recklessly and with apparent impunity?

An important aspect of policing is to defuse and deescalate situations when possible, not make a bad situation worse. This communication does none of that. If you want to regain trust, be the better person and use this tragic event to improve, not double down.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 35 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It will inevitably focus more on pleasing its public investors than anything else, therefore enshittification.

Maybe Steam/Valve is a unicorn, but it's not publicly traded and it's doing just fine.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Negligence doesn’t judge hindsight outcomes, it judges whether the officer’s perceptions and decisions were reasonable under the circumstances. Stress explains behavior, it does not excuse it. If an officer's own actions created the danger, misread a non-threat, or violated training, policy, or basic tactical principles, then their perception under stress can itself be negligent.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They escalated the situation, didn't follow the procedures and put everyone, including themselves at risk and someone died. There's at least some criminal negligence.

21
[Epic] Wildgate (store.epicgames.com)
10
IncusOS released (linuxcontainers.org)
71
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by mp3@lemmy.ca to c/main@lemmy.ca
 

cross-posted from: https://threadiverse.link/lemmy.ml/post/29579005

Since we depend on them to have this platform, it seems fair to spread their request for donations. To be clear, this is to finance the developers who build this software, and has nothing to do with our specific instance operational costs.

From the Lemmy developers

An open source project the size of Lemmy needs constant work to manage the project, implement new features and fix bugs. Dessalines and I work full-time on these tasks and more. As there is no advertising or tracking, all of our work is funded through donations. Unfortunately the amount of donations has decreased to only 2000€ per month. This leaves only 1000€ per developer, which is not enough to pay my bills. With the current level of donations I will be forced to find another job, and drastically reduce my contributions to Lemmy. To avoid this outcome and keep Lemmy growing, I ask you to please make a recurring donation:

Liberapay | Ko-fi | Patreon | OpenCollective | Crypto

If you want more information before donating, consider the comparison with Reddit. It began as startup funded by rich investors. The site is managed by corporate executives who over time have become more and more disconnected from normal users. Their main goal is to make investors happy and to make a profit. This leads to user-hostile decisions like firing the employee responsible for AMAs, blocking third-party apps and more. As Reddit is a single website under a single authority, it means all users need to follow the same rules, including ridiculous ones like censoring the name "Luigi".

Lemmy represents a new type of social media which is the complete opposite of Reddit. It is split across many different websites, each with its own rules, and managed by normal people who actually care about the users. There is no company and no profit motive. Much of the work is carried out by volunteer admins, mods and posters, who contribute out of enthusiasm and not for money. For users this is great as there is no advertising nor tracking, and no chance of takeover by a billionaire. Additionally there are no builtin political or ideological restrictions. You can use the software for any purpose you like, add your own restrictions or scrutinize its inner workings. Lemmy truly belongs to everyone.

Dessalines and I work fulltime on Lemmy to keep up with all the feature requests, bug reports and development work. Even so there is barely enough time in the day, and no time for a second job. Previously I sometimes had to rely on my personal savings to keep developing Lemmy for you, but that can't go on forever. We partly rely on NLnet for funding, but they only pay for development of new features, and not for mandatory maintenance work. The only available option are user donations. To keep it viable donations need to reach a minimum of 5000€ per month, resulting in a modest salary of 2500€ per developer. If that goal is reached Dessalines and I can stop worrying about money, and fully focus on improving the software for the benefit of all users and instances. Please use the link below to see current donation stats and make your contribution! We especially rely on recurring donations to secure the long-term development and make Lemmy the best it can be.

Donate

 

If you're willing to step up as a moderator and make it flourish, please request it at !communityrequests@lemmy.ca 🙂

view more: next ›