this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
514 points (96.4% liked)

Memes

45581 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 75 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Why would robots make robots in child form?

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Same reason I made a child

Incredible foolishness

[–] lauha@lemmy.one 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One molecule 3.7 billion years ago found out how to replicate and it's been down hill ever since.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I suspect that's how we all came into this world.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 30 points 1 year ago

If they're calling a brain their original processor, these robots could be a result of successful transhumanism rather than conventional robots, ie, they could be humans that have made themselves into robots, rather than robots built for some specific purpose. In that case, they might create child robots and grow them over time to reproduce, just because they find that mode of reproduction familiar and wish to continue it.

[–] NakariLexfortaine@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago

Tight space requirements.

The childbots yearn for the tubes.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Almost as interesting as a robot who builds a museum.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Could just be a compact model, the big one could just be stupidly pointing out the obvious to a far more advanced compact model that's just given a lecture on the history of robotic processors.

The compact advanced model might just be about to say "Very good, I'm glad you were listening".

[–] Hux@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Maybe it’s a Grow-bot…

[–] giantfloppycock@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And why must the child-bot be so thicc?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Title of your autobiography.

[–] TheOakTree@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

I like to imagine that the childbots are made in the image of the parentbots, and the childbots eventually are tasked with picking out preferred larger parts as a growing rite.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Small hands. Good for thievin', as the Ravagers say.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

The original processor would be far smaller and simpler. It took millions of years of evolution before that one showed up.

[–] aluminium@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Shit can't even do math without errors, lmao.

[–] helios@social.ggbox.fr 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can run DOOM on E.Coli bacteria, so I'm sure you can run it on anything.

[–] SsxChaos@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

Me in 2050 playing Doom on an E.Coli bacteria from the newest Elon musk's Neuro Chip

[–] solarvector@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Predates the 8086, truly a marvel of the transition point of biological to mechanical engineering.

[–] unreachable@lemmy.id 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

next iteration, the borg, biomech engineering

From the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh, it disgusted me. I craved the strength and certainty of steel. I aspired to the purity of the blessed Machine.

Your kind cling to your flesh, as if it will not decay and fail you. One day, the crude biomass that you call a temple will wither, and you will beg my kind to save you.

But I am already saved. For the Machine is immortal.

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago