Daily reminder that Kerch bridge isn't civilian infrastructure, it's first of all a strategic war logistics artery. It is also an illegal building on Ukrainian territory.

[–] avater@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

was there really any doubt about this? The fucking center of moscow is a valid strategic target...the russians wanted war now they got it!

I don't see the point why the Ukranians should not bonmbing the living crap out of everything the russians have occupied!

[–] specialdealer@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes I’m sick of the pontification around valid targets for Ukraine. They have been invaded. Any Russian anything is a valid target until they leave.

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Civilians are not valid targets, but casualties should be expected if the Kremlin has military targets by civilians.

[–] AllahFucksKids@fedia.io 3 points 2 years ago

I agree with you. I don't feel bad for any dead Russian, but I wouldn't be happy if a school or hospital was directly targeted. Ukraine is doing things with honor. Honor is not something you can buy on Amazon so most people don't care for it now, but it is amazing to see some still have it.

[–] specialdealer@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Civilians living on stolen land on top of the graves of its murdered inhabitants are absolutely valid targets.

[–] specialdealer@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

I stand behind anything the Ukrainians decide is a valid target. Well not literally. If I hear it’s civilian, that’s Russian propaganda.

[–] zacher_glachl@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm looking forward to the Kerch Strait pier into nothing

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

It'll make a nice war memorial.

[–] Custoslibera@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

What bridge?! I can’t see anything at all!