this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
138 points (83.8% liked)

World News

32285 readers
1 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 53 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Maybe at some point the Americans will get scared that the Chinese are actually making strides ahead of them in electrification and decarbonization to actually get unstuck from their idiotic culture war over fossil fuels.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 33 points 2 years ago (1 children)

America will stop trying to sell oil when it runs out of oil and not one second before, no matter the actual cost.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

and will lash out for being behind for as long as they still have guns

[–] librejoe@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Eh take news from China with a Giga size grain of salt.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 years ago

I don't know about this particular piece of news, but the insane expansion of HSR for example is no fake news.

[–] bilb@lem.monster 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

As opposed to news from the united states, which is certified good and true and democratic

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It will take a new space race for that to happen.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

The space race is on. That’s why Starship has been launching so much. Someone at the FAA must have finally realized that if SpaceX doesn’t go ahead at full SpaceX speed, we’re gonna see China take over space.

They’ve got a space station and a rover on the moon. China will easily overtake us in space, has already in a few places.

[–] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

and africa with that whole silk road thing

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] roadrunner_ex@lemmy.ca 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 6 points 2 years ago

Discharge though. Ew.

[–] WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I see what you did there

[–] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 years ago (4 children)

To the best of my knowledge, this is the first commercially-funded (i.e., non-government) nuclear fusion reactor. Notable investors are MiHoYo (developers of Genshin Impact), Nio (Chinese EV company), and Sequoia Capital...

[–] kbin_space_program@kbin.run 43 points 2 years ago (23 children)

It's the CCP. You can't have a non government funded company.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (4 children)

In your guys opinion, is that good or bad? Privately funded would mean proprietary & profit driven implementation for such a crucial technology (if successful). I personally don't like it.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The CPC still maintains a lot of influence over companies even when they're getting their funding from private industry as part of their "politics in command" strategy for controlling market forces. We'll see how it plays out.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yep, if they need to disappear a CEO, no matter how big, they can and have done so in the past.

[–] match@pawb.social 17 points 2 years ago

i don't know why you got a downvote, disappearinga CEO should be the most popular thing the ccp does

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago

Any path that takes us to unlimited clean energy is the right one IMO. We could always do a little espionage and make our own domestic fusion drive eventually.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

No??

I've supported engineering at several privately funded nuclear fusion companies, though all of them, this Chinese company included, are building a product out of public school research.

Off the top of my head there's:

  • CFS
  • TAE technologies
  • Thea
  • Zap Energy

And several more...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago

It is not the first commercially funded fusion reactor even assuming this qualified.

https://www.energystartups.org/top/fusion-energy/

Not hard to find a bunch.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (15 children)

This is an article from a CCP operated tabloid... Seriously?

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] user134450@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In the image of the discharge you can clearly see that the device has no cladding. That means a discharge would be limited to a duration of a few seconds, otherwise the material ablated from the wall would lead to extreme heat losses of the plasma. Did they include a future vessel cladding to the plasma volume calculation in the article?

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Good points and questions. First wall interaction is going to be an interesting problem for this team to work around.

load more comments
view more: next ›