this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
135 points (98.6% liked)

Hacker News

2171 readers
31 users here now

A mirror of Hacker News' best submissions.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scrotumnipples@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Fuck HP. All my homies hate HP.

EcoTank represent!

[–] Amilo159@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I must say eco tank does look like solid printers, but I simply can't bear the word "inkjet" any more. It's laser for me.

[–] kgbbot@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Gotta say I wish I had picked up the higher end ecotank but the basic is hands down the best printer I've ever had

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 years ago

Laser if you don't need photo printing. But if you do need InkJet then seems EcoTank is the way to go for sure.

[–] M0oP0o@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

FIRE (up) THE LAZER(printers)!

[–] totallynotarobot@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It is well-documented that ink is not required in order to scan or to fax a document...

The reason Good will never prevail over Evil in this world is that Good is required to document shit like this, whereas Evil can get miles ahead being assholes in the time it takes to do that.

[–] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

I hope this goes for all of them. I had an old Canon printer I used for scanning only that I had offline and it accidentally went online and they bricked it.

[–] KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck HP

[–] TheObserver@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Ecotanks ftw. Sure they are slightly slower and when the paper gets damp the ink smears but for the price of the ink I'll take it. I bought a 3 pack of black ink 3 years ago and to this day only 1 bottle has been used.