this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
637 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

70711 readers
3335 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Judge denies HP's plea to throw out all-in-one printer lockdown lawsuit - AiO devices won't scan or fax without ink, and plaintiffs say IT giant illegally withheld that info from buyers::AiO devices won't scan or fax without ink, and plaintiffs say IT giant illegally withheld that info from buyers

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stu@lemmy.pit.ninja 159 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Am I the only one who thinks it's crazy that the only grounds they have are that HP didn't disclose that their All-In-Ones won't let you scan or fax without ink and not, you know, the fact that they do that in the first place? It should be illegal to disable critical functions of a device simply because an unrelated function is temporarily unavailable. There's no technical reason HP is doing this other than, "fuck you, buy more ink."

[–] brotazoa@lemmy.world 64 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Unfortunately this is the difference between illegal and unethical, and I don't gather that HP cares much about ethics. Hopefully right-to-repair laws will cover these cases in the future too.

[–] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 2 years ago

It's anti-consumer, but I guess that just falls under unethical for now

[–] decay@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

I recently had a printer to configure (IT) that was HP, and it needed an internet connection and registration to print over USB (well, at all); guess what? Dead ethernet port. Now (even with a working USB) the printer is just landfill food waiting to reach our bloodstream in a few years time. I ~~fucking hate~~ love HP!

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 years ago

Guess who the laws are actually designed to protect

[–] C4d@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

The last and only printer that I bought from HP worked well and didn’t pull any shenanigans, it was a Laserjet 5L.

Since then, feedback from colleagues and what I’ve seen from reviews and tech communities put me off buying HP again. Between their cloud printing, their inkjet cartridge verification and the USB ports covered in stickers and now this…

[–] Gsus4@feddit.nl 8 points 2 years ago

I mean, you can sell a shitty product, that's not a crime, the crime is the false advertising or if it is a danger to people

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 4 points 2 years ago

Imagine in the future, your car just stopped working entirely and lock you out because your heated-seats subscription expired.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 32 points 2 years ago

HP are a real scumbag company.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I still don't get why anyone is buying inkjet printers for the past 20 years. It makes zero sense to me.

[–] OskarAxolotl@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Color laser printers are very expensive and still don't achieve the same picture quality as an inkjet printer. And I have read once that dust from laser printers might cause cancer but not sure how much there really is to that.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Color lasers are about $300 dollars, do better quality, and have 10x the output per cartridge on a bad day. And they don't dry rot when left without printing for extended periods. Replace the ink on an inkjet more than twice, and a laser is already a better deal.

[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

If you want to print pictures to hang on your wall, ink printers print much better color quality.

If you want flat graphics to print on a document, laser is better.

Just depends on what your use case is.

[–] anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Not just that, but it’s impossible to find a colour laser that’ll do 11x17 and duplex. I think my only option is a small office printer lease.

[–] Bootheal0179@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My in-laws gave my son an HP Envy. I placed a big Apple logo next to the HP logo. I have Apple logos on my trash bins too. Basically, any trash around the house gets an Apple logo stuck to it

[–] bjorney@bjorney.lol 2 points 2 years ago
[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Why is anyone buying a printer at all?

Hey, printer people out there! What do you you use your printer for? My printer is just sitting idle collecting dust. Can’t think of anything I would need to print. Everything is digital these days.

[–] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

In less developed countries, you'd need printed copies for a lot of stuff, especially legal documents.

Speaking from experience.

[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Exactly this. I live in a first-ish world country around Asia, and the moment you need paperwork dealt in any other nearby country, a printer is going to save you lots of trips to the convenience store.

[–] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ugh... Asian beureaucracy at its best...

South East Asia?

[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago
[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh, I remember those. The government here has been working to go digital for the past 30 years, and now it’s beginning to pay off.

[–] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Good for you! My country is going toward that direction, but corruption kinda keeps the progress slow. Still some progress here and there.

[–] Hexarei@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago

I have a printer for the occasional need to print documents. Mind blowing I know, but that's why I keep one around. It gathers dust most of the time, but it's super useful when the odd need arises.

[–] gaael@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I for one can't read correctly anything longer than a lemmy post on a screen. I print more or less anything that I'm want to read with my brain fully present - I usually outline and comment on paper too, makes it easier to remember. Latest use case : printing out dnd character sheets to do my charac design for BG3

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

Ok, that seems like a sensible use case.

I’ve heard many people say that reading stuff on a screen is more distracting and they have trouble focusing. I don’t feel that way, so screens are just fine for me.

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

My guess. Marketing.

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

“IT giant illegally left out that info”. Bruh. THEY LIED!

[–] viking 9 points 2 years ago

They did, but that's not a legal term, so a judge won't use it.

[–] C4d@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 4 points 2 years ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/N9wsjroVlu8

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I have no printers in my house. I refuse that entire industry. Its a scam.