this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Apple

18963 readers
86 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] berkeleyblue@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hefty but if you can keep using them I think the investement kinda quickly pays off I’d assume. Hope it’s gonna be the same as with watch bands and those things stay compatible over a lot of generations. I think I’d buy them once but buying them again and again for each generation I may end up buying would suck…

[–] mjhagen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Eyes change also, every few years I need to adjust my prescription.

[–] themz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Saving you a click – the article is just empty waffle around this Gurman tweet: "I would guess that the Zeiss prescription lenses for the Vision Pro will be at least $300-600 a pair, unless Apple is eating part of the cost given the already high price of the headset itself."

[–] personalife@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That tracks. I use prescription lenses for my Quest 2, and they were roughly $200-300.

[–] realitista@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I paid 85EUR for the ones in my PSVR2. I've never seen any on the market for over $200.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

I mean, have you seen how much they sell watch bands for?