this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
20 points (95.5% liked)

Australian Politics

1544 readers
17 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Longmactoppedup@aussie.zone 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Behold the liberal party base.

[–] NorthofReality@aussie.zone 5 points 2 years ago

What a sad looking bunch. There's no one there who isn't a crusty old white person.

[–] Nonameuser678@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago

Caption this photo.

[–] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

While I'm a strong supporter of the Voice, I fear it's going to be defeated. I've spoken to a number of people around me and there's genuine confusion around whether it's something indigenous Australians want. While the statistics show 80-90% support amongst indigenous Australians for the Voice, when the Coalition trots out Price and Mundine, the public sees a sizable dissenting indigenous faction. Those I've spoken to are unsure if they should vote yes solely on the basis that they aren't sure if indigenous Australians want it, and that's from my more progressive mates.

Labor has and is botching this campaign in a major way. Their near silence and passive approach to this campaign is failing and it's shifting normally supportive people into undecideds, let along flipping the undecided voters.

Either Labor and the Greens lift their game fast or this referendum is dead. Polling is suggesting that support has already dipped below 50%.

[–] kerr@aussie.zone 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Here’s a quote from the “comedian” who spoke at the conference.

“I’d like to acknowledge the traditional rent-seekers, past, present and emerging,” Marks said, to applause from the crowd. “But seriously, I’d like to acknowledge the traditional owners – violent black men. I hope there are some real feminists in the audience who appreciate the part-truth of that joke.”

The No side can argue they’re doing because of the constitutional change or underperformance of the changes, but when you invite someone who speaks like that, it’s plain to see the why.

[–] Minarble@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago

Did that audience applaud because they thought he was acknowledging them? Or is that much self awareness eternally beyond them.

What a miserable bunch.

[–] trk@aussie.zone 8 points 2 years ago

The Liberal senator said unlike the state's contentious Aboriginal cultural heritage legislation — which could be, and has been, repealed — a change to the constitution was permanent.

"You can't simply roll back a bad amendment such as the Voice to Parliament," she said.

The critical part, in my opinion.

For me this is actually a good thing - when Labor inevitably loses the next election, the Liberals can't immediately remove any progress they made.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is 1000 people a lot? I wouldn’t have thought so if this is a campaign rally. Seems like not much to the story either way.

[–] Nath@aussie.zone 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They are old, grumpy and white. The only person in that photo under 70 was senator Price wearing the "no" T-shirt.