this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
402 points (94.1% liked)

politics

23989 readers
3593 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Biden doesn't care about wet people

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kingofthezyx@lemm.ee 78 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Okay I'm not trying to defend Fox here, but it seems like this was a joke.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 78 points 2 years ago (2 children)

But will their viewers know that?

[–] Cyclist@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago

And therein lies the rub.

[–] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] derpo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Idk what’s with the downvotes. Maybe people can’t do without a /s

[–] Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Oh well, it is what it is, guess I'll add the /s

Or they need some supporting evidence for the "we're entertainment, not news" argument at trial.

[–] HWK_290@lemmy.world 70 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Of course Biden is in league with... Hillary

[–] HWK_290@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] HWK_290@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Or redrawing the path with sharpie?

[–] HWK_290@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

This is too easy. Big water... Ocean water

[–] genoxidedev1@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

IF I YOUR FAVORITE PRESIDENT TRUMP was in this situation NOW I would LITERALLY WRITE AN AI that HACKS the JEWISH SPACE LASERS SPONSORED by FAUX FAUCI and made THEM DESTROY the hurricane with 8K ULTRA PRESISON believe ME I'VE seen them they're the WORST lasers EVER SEEN but my HACK that was made by ME and the BEST team they're good guys! Very fine people! would have made them STRONG enough TO DESTROY THE HURRICANE. Meanwhile DeSanctimonious who is a BAD man and many of the BEST PEOPEL are saying it! is in BED with BIDEN and the DEEP STATE to STEER the hurricane to KILL my voters! It's true! They LITERALLY called the HURRICANE Hillary! It's the WORST hurricane believe me! I've seen it myself and ALL the GOOD people say it's the WORST! DON'T TRUST THEM! Vote TRUMP 2024 and stay safe!

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wait this isn't an Onion post...

[–] stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I refuse boing boing as a reputable news source lol

[–] WeaselBoy@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I bet Trump’s wall would have stopped it. Take that liberals

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Nah, Trump would just have drawn a different path with his Sharpie. Problem solved.

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Would have tried to nuke it.

[–] Bendavisunlv6@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 2 years ago (6 children)

It’s kind of an obvious joke about the border and immigration. The storm made landfall in Mexico and is now moving into the US. Conservatives think Biden just lets everyone in Mexico come over the border, so that’s the joke. Meanwhile liberals are laughing because they take it literally and think conservatives believe a storm can be detained. Come on folks. You need to be able to get a joke that was crafted for someone else or you are really stuck in your perspective.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's a joke but it's a really low quality one.

[–] Pips@lemmy.film 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

All the pieces to the joke are there but Fox proved yet again that conservatives suck at comedy.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah the work of joke writing is taking those pieces and assembling them together in a way that makes it funny.

But you know what they say: lazy, entitled conservatives just don't want to do the work.

[–] Bendavisunlv6@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 years ago

Agreed. It’s what’s called a cheap shot.

[–] halferect@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

It's hard to tell since the last time the republican party was in charge the leader of the party seriously thought you could just nuke a hurricane so I would not be surprised if the viewers of fox actually do blame Biden and think you can detain a hurricane

[–] CarlsIII@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Either they’re serious, and that’s bad, or they made a joke that wasn’t funny, which is also bad. I’ll roll my eyes either way.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

So appropriate to joke about natural disasters.

[–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

If so, it's a really bad joke. Faux news has said equally crazy things.

[–] sik0fewl@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He didn't even bring them paper towels!

[–] bdesk@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago
[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Biden is not to blame for the hurricane or any natural disaster.

[–] formergijoe@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

Yeah he is. He could have just changed the path of the storm with a Sharpie like Great Lord Trump, Bringer of Rains.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In Canada the RW/Kremlin trolls blame our PM for the fires. Same deal.

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

At least that has a thin veneer of plausibility. Technically, Trudeau could personally setting fires purposely, in that any person could set a fire in multiple locations across the country. Expecting someone to be able to stop a hurricane from entering the country is a whole new level of trolling.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Both are ridiculous and have ZERO plausibility.

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, both are ridiculous. But setting a fire is a lot more plausible than stopping a hurricane.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's NOT plausible to suggest my PM is setting fires.

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

Yes, of course, in reality it is not plausible that the prime minister of Canada is purposely setting wildfires. However, it is more plausible that Trudeau could physically set a fire than Biden could stop a hurricane. That's the only point I was making.

[–] Spaghetti_Hitchens@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's not the rain that's the problem with Hilary; it's the emails.

[–] TubeTalkerX@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Buttery Males slipped right in!

[–] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Well they were good and lubricated for the task

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Lock her-icane up?