this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
87 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

39293 readers
55 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ConsciousCode@beehaw.org 19 points 2 years ago

The EU giveth (removable batteries, mandated USB-C) and it taketh away

[–] Jummit@lemmy.one 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

violations could bring fines worth up to 6 percent of their global revenue – which could amount to billions – or even a ban from the EU.

Not too shabby! Seems like the laws at least have some teeth.

[–] ruination@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wish GDPR had the same kind of teeth.

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[–] ruination@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

I feel like common knowledge of all the shit big tech companies have pulled throughout their history is sufficient justification for giving massive fines.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

No better source than Al-Jazeera?

[–] LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 years ago

Genuinely ignorant, what wrong with Al-Jazeera? Sure, it's biased on some topics, but aren't all news sources?

[–] itsAllDigital@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So it's the "We can take down what we don't like"-Act

[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 34 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Oh God no, the horror that the EU could remove content that promotes hatred!

[–] x3i@lemmy.x3i.tech 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The problem is usually in the broadness of the definition. Less democratic regimes can easily use this to forbid material about opposing views and parties. Double-edged sword.

[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think the problem is that social media has been used for great evil so an attempt to curb that is good.

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago

At least it's a democratic body. Way better than Musk being in capricious control of deleting speech rights.

[–] lemillionsocks@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago

Cant less democratic regimes do that anyway?

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 years ago

It's targetting only the biggest platforms and there is nothing in EU taking control.