this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
454 points (95.0% liked)

PC Gaming

7710 readers
1 users here now

Rule #1: Be civil

Rule #2: No spam, memes, off-topic, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #3: No advertisements

Rule #4: No streams, random gameplay videos, highlights, or shorts

Rule #5: No erotic games or porn

Rule #6: No facilitating piracy

Rule #7: No duplicates

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Epic First Run programme allows developers of any size to claim 100% of revenue if they agree to make their game exclusive on the Epic Games Store for six months.

After the six months are up, the game will revert to the standard Epic Games Store revenue split of 88% for the developer and 12% for Epic Games.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] red@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Fuck Epic and any store who tries to remove games from others.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] regbin_@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I don't have a problem with Epic offering this. The problem is with publishers that take this offer. Bunch of greedy bastards.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fraylor@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Developers, or their MBA publishers? I HIGHLY doubt developers beyond indie studios benefit from this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Any game that signs a deal with epic like this goes on my boycott list.

[–] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (13 children)

And so the enshitification of epic begins.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Anonymousllama@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Actually a compelling deal for developers, wonder how many indie / AA developers will go for that instead of steam

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] CrunchyBoy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I don't think I've spent any money on the Epic Launcher yet but I'm happy to see them try their best. Competition is good and needed.

[–] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The problem with Epics approach is theyre doing competition for devs, not compition for consumers.

Compition for content usually comes at the cost of consumer convenience or benefit (e.g the multitude of streaming platforms for movies and videos)

[–] Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com 10 points 2 years ago

Exactly. This isn’t encouraging competition; It’s encouraging exclusivity. The two are diametrically opposed. If you’re competing over exclusives, you’re not really competing to make the best platform possible. It’s a race to the bottom, because Epic has consistently proven that they don’t care about the consumer experience. Their launcher is hot garbage, and they seemingly have no plans on improving it. Meanwhile, Steam has a best-in-class launcher and has been making improvements every single week.

If Epic focused on improving the usability and the feature set, I think they’d find gamers much more willing to give it a try. But when every single experience with a platform is bad, gamers are going to dig their heels in and refuse to use it out of spite.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zorque@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago

They've mostly tried their best to make as much money as possible, not actually compete as a service, though, unfortunately.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›