this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
17 points (100.0% liked)

Australian Politics

1556 readers
29 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why is this a single box people have to write in, rather than two boxes with "yes" or "no" that the voter has to tick, cross, fill in to select?

What if people write yes/no in their own language.

Honestly this set up does seem dumb and leaves so much to for error.

[–] Marin_Rider@aussie.zone 6 points 2 years ago

i tend to agree, the instructions are pretty simple, but lets face it some of us have freaking terrible handwriting (and some physically cant due to various disabilities etc). 2 boxes would have been the most foolproof method

[–] quicken@aussie.zone 4 points 2 years ago

I think there'd be a big fight over the order of the boxes

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If the instructions say to write yes or no and you put a tick or a cross, you’re too dumb for your vote to count.

[–] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago

Exactly, the AEC even posted a guide on how to vote!

[–] Paradoxvoid@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To be honest, I can see where the no campaign is coming from though - seems unfair for ticks to count as a valid vote but crosses to not count.

Remove them both IMO, but that ship has sailed for this particular referendum.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yep if you count a tick as yes you need to count a cross as no. Super dodgy from the Yes side to try and get both as a yes.

[–] ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zone 4 points 2 years ago

It's just a long-standing way in which the AEC interprets the. It's nothing special to this referendum

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

shut the almighty FUCK up, Dutton. Sit your bitch arse down.

[–] Minarble@aussie.zone 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't even care if he's got a valid argument any more I just want the turd to fuck off

[–] dillekant@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 years ago

Why not have three options:

  • I agree with the voice
  • I don't agree with not having a non voice
  • I agree (not) with having a voice but not really

If you cant read the form that clearly says how to respond to the question, genuinely curious if they have the mental capacity to understand the question being put to them.