No. It depends on what I went to do.
this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
79 points (97.6% liked)
Asklemmy
43810 readers
1 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Exactly. I once drove 12 hours to save $6k on shipping. I was there for 45 minutes while four pallets were loaded.
For travel I usually use as a rule of thumb, that you need to stay the same number of days as there were hours in the flight to get there. So for example a quick two hour hop lends itself nicely to a weekend getaway, whereas a transcontinental flight implies staying a week or two. This tends to be advantageous anyway, for jet lag purposes.
Nifty.
If I hike up a hill for an hour, it was about the journey and I only need to stay at the top for 5 - 10 minutes.
It really depends, my friend was having a hard time once so in the evening I drove 3 hours to go see them, had a beer with them, then came home. I think it was absolutely worth it. I've also driven that far to buy something that took 15 minutes.
But say, a museum, I'd definitely want to make a day of it if I was driving that far. Maybe more.
Depends where.
DMV? 0h.
Family? 2x minimum.
Friends? Whatever I can get.
7X. If I have to travel a day to go on vacation I will be staying for at least a week.
If Neil Armstrong was resting this, he would laugh. So many months of preparation, just to walk a very short while on the moon
It's not about the travel
For a one night stand 1/4x. I guess it really depends on the action if you now what I mean.
It depends really, but my go to in general is about as much time as I'm going to spend driving.
Sometimes though I don't need to stay that long if the company is great or the place is great.
An example of a fun time with a 3 hour drive (1 way) and less than 6 at the destination: I went hiking with a good friend of mine and the hike only took 4.5 hours. The views were worth it and the company made it that much better.
An example of a crap time with a 2 hour drive (1 way) and less than 4 at the destination: hiking (again) except the person I was to be hiking with spent the night before getting drunk and rather than tell me they were too hung over to hike, came along anyways. He started vomiting 30 minutes into the trail, so we have to turn around and go home.
X/2+7 is like the 80-20 rule: it fits 80% of the time.
Given a travel time of X, half that time plus 7 more hours seems reasonable, until it isn't. 1 hour? Full day. 2 hours? Also a full day. 8 hours? Now were talking 2 days with an overnight expense and 80% per diem.
Math. It works.
Do you mind explaining a little more? How do you get two days from 8 hours (8/2 + 7 = only 11 hours not 48)?
Edit: Oh, because nobody's spending 8 hours traveling and then 11 hours at the place and then going back home without staying overnight.
Isn't that also the equation for finding your youngest possible date? I'm 27 and according to that my lower limit is 20.5.
It's like the 80-20 rule, I say!
2/3 of X^2 seems pretty close
Obviously it depends (for work when I can work on the train I am okay with longer journeys) but there has to be some sort of non-linearity involved, I agree!
I've done .25x so I guess it depends how good the destination is and who I'm going with.
Depends on other factors like who I'm meeting, time of day, etc. Purely on the time to get there though I think 2x minimum to make it feel worth it imo
I wouldnโt put a time on it.
I would drive for a dozen hours for things that last a few minutes.
JS Bach walked hundreds of miles to hear someone play the organ.
I love my audio books, so driving isn't a huge complaint. I once drove 12 hours to hang out with family for Thanksgiving (~4 hours) and then drove back (another 12 hours).
Bach didn't have planes trains and automobiles...
I don't mind driving, especially through the mountains. So I don't really think twice driving for 3 hours each way to spend an hour apple picking, for instance.
I'd say x1.5 the amount of that time.
But sometimes the journey is more important than destination.
X hours. I prefer 2X hours, but X is my minimum.
So you're saying a 1:1 travel to staying ratio?
I think it's a 2:1 ratio because it's X hours traveling there, X hours spent at the location, and then X hours coming back home, totaling 2X hours in transit.
At least a much time there as time to get there. Not the round trip time.
Preferably, at least as much time there as round trip time. However, I have violated this, so it is clearly not my limit.
Technically, I have stayed for shorter times. Those were not "for fun" trips and had important goals attached.
I am also discounting all one-way trips of less than an hour.
Depends on what I'm there for. I've done 0.8X for a pretty long trip and would have gone faster if it wasn't for bureaucracy.
PS i dont enjoy traveling
Everywhere is an hour away from where I live, so X hours is my standard for high quality experiences, to reference your formula.
X + 4 at minimum but it's very situationally dependent.
X+4 what? Hours?
Generally around 3-4X for me, except if I'm riding a motorcycle or driving a sports car, where the travelling is the main event.
X^2
I've been to stores 4 hours from where I live and been there for like half an hour before. has to be like a full day of driving (10 hours) for me to feel like i have to stay over night