this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
14 points (67.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

38672 readers
446 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Title

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Click on all the squares where you see a motorbike.

Failed! There was a fraction of motorbike behind the car in the background that you couldn't possibly see. Try again.

Rinse and repeat, 15 more times.

[–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

More of an !unpopularopinion@lemmy.world than a showerthought.

Also, you're very wrong.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ads can be blocked, captchas are required to access certain contents, and some are absurdly annoying if they detect you are using a vpn or tor.

[–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But captchas at least have purpose other filling my brain with bullshit.

And yes, ads can be blocked but a block ad is just ... not there. So of course a captacha is more annoying than not seeing an ad. But that wasn't the question. I'd rather solve captchas for 5 minues than watch a single 30 second ad.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, but captchas are something you see if your privacy minded, not staying signed in, no cookies, that type of stuff.

If you're doing that, you're running an ad blocker as well.

So it's more that you see ads or you see captchas, rarely would someone run into both frequently.

Which likely lines up with what someone finds more annoying, it's what they see most.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't mind when there is one captcha. ONE. But when you use privacy tools such as a vpn, you rarely have to solve one captcha. You need to solve several, at times, losing more than 5 minutes because they refuse to let you in when they see you are on a vpn.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you'd literally rather waste 5 minutes clicking on traffic lights, than 30 seconds watching a video, that's just an excessive hate for ads.

I'm not saying you have to like them, but spending 4 minutes and 30 seconds just to avoid them, is bordering on an unhealthy phobia.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

See?

You have no idea about it because you'd rather be tracked across the net.

If you weren't so abrasive about it, someone probably would have taken the time to explain why you should care. But when you act like that, why would people try to help you?

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right. And wrong, respectively.

[–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 3 points 1 year ago

I can respect that.

[–] river_chunk@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, and Google captchas are the worsts of all of them.

I found Buster a while ago and works most of the times, it use the accesibility audio challenger to try to solve it using speech recognition. When it don't work I found more easy to try the audio challenger, you just need to write the part that you understand and not all you hear, less picky than the images, still a pain in the ass

[–] mbinn@fedia.io 1 points 11 months ago

Thanks for sharing, will add this moving forward :)

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Was there more to this thought?

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

My single-cell brain already delivered much more than it could.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 3 points 1 year ago

Yes. You can block ads entirely. But the more you use stuff to block tracking and ads, the more you get captchas.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On a scale of zero to ten, how do you rate ads and captchas? Zero is completely neutral and harmless, and 10 is enough to spark acts of physical violence.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ads are 8/10 but it's been ages since I saw one of them. Captchas are easily 17/10.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Soo… a check list of war crimes, rivers running red etc?

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These are 1/captcha, typically.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 months ago

Now I know the backstory of Postal.