this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
284 points (98.0% liked)

Memes

45581 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 49 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Only if you’re not the government.

[–] spauldo@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

The exclusive right to commit violence is a standard feature of governments, yes.

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago

I mean that's basically what the war is about: who all is the government where (i.e. who can arbitrarily kill people legally).

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If someone tries to kill you just say "no thank you."

Legally they cannot kill you.

[–] cursedanubis@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago

If you do not consent, their bullets cannot enter your body either

[–] Montagge@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago

It's only legal to kill people when rich people can profit from it

[–] DeathWearsANecktie@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

TikTok girl ends all war

[–] solidgrue@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Calls to mind the end of Month Python and the Holy Grail wherein the massed armies of King Arthur are rounded up and arrested by some constables for disturbing the peace upon the moors.

[–] scubbo@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

That ending was such a cop-out

[–] Ertebolle@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Although one wonders if "War and Peace" would have been as highly acclaimed as it was if it was published under its original name "War: What Is It Good For?"

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Ertebolle@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Fun fact: that same actor also played Admiral Hanson in the classic Star Trek: The Next Generation 2-parter "The Best of Both Worlds."

[–] Absolutemehperson@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Come on Jerry, that's not real!

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

But they have a point, how can people legally kill other people, will every case be checked?

[–] Knuschberkeks@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

not literally every case, but yes there are international laws (e.g Geneva Conventions, Hague Conventions, Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons) in place detailing who is allowed to kill who and in what way.

[–] eldain@feddit.nl 4 points 2 years ago

By disabling the rule of law in an area. The legal government and law enforcement is overpowered and you get a zone of martial law by the strongest force present, which may or may not be bound by a mandate of their origin country, and hence could be held responsible and controlled for acts outside of their mandate.

[–] Absolutemehperson@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Isn't the point of official "declaration of war" thing is to kill people legally?

[–] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

what if it's not really a war, not that formal just a casual occasion like it's just a holiday that somehow became a special military operation

[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 6 points 2 years ago

Legit question ngl

[–] Thteven@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago
[–] ripcord@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

I mean, war is partly when any/most rule of law has broken down or isn't present.

[–] Etienne_Dahu@jlai.lu 2 points 2 years ago

"Curses! Foiled again!"

-Putin, probably

[–] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Not when it's over oil, apparently.