this is what arguing with anyone on the internet feels like
this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
342 points (100.0% liked)
196
17790 readers
390 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Strawman fallacy.
Survivalship bias
Are you gaslighting me?!
"It's ILLEGAL to steal peoples money"
"source?"
Make me remember a conversation a guy claim he could easily went 2000 miles in one day, another response even at 70mph it would take more than a day, the guy just reply SOURCE? like some kind of trained reaction
“Clause two of the anti robber 1898 act”
“Im not reading that”
(I have no understanding of the law)
I don't think the second one is whataboutism?
Misidentifying the fallacy makes it all the more realistic.
Yeah it's more of an imagineism
Just say "no"
God, what an idiot. He’s not stealing your bank details, he’s politely asking for them.
The majority of hacking is this right here.
Funnily enough, the guy refusing to give their bank details IS presenting poor arguments. Of course, this is assuming that both parties have consented to enter a debate. If this was indeed a debate, it would kinda delve into a debate over the objectivity/subjectivity of morality as a whole.
"What are your bank details?"
"... (No response)"