this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025

201 points (95.9% liked)

Games

39217 readers

1694 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

!gaming@Lemmy.world: Our sister community, focused on PC and console gaming. Meme are allowed.
!photomode@feddit.uk: For all your screenshots needs, to share your love for games graphics.
!vgmusic@lemmy.world: A community to share your love for video games music

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

!JeuxVideo@jlai.lu: French

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Dremor@lemmy.world

JonsJava@lemmy.world

fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Dremor@jlai.lu

modfxomt@lemmy.world

201

Minecraft Gets Major Visual Overhaul With Volumetric Lighting And Enhanced Shadows (www.rockpapershotgun.com)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by tonytins@pawb.social to c/games@lemmy.world

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Updated: Changed headline.

all 40 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 72 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I might not have much of a horse in this race as someone that only really plays Minecraft once in a blue moon (and normally swiftly puts it down because I'm not that kind of creative and I get too stressed out from survival mode), but honestly, I'm not a fan.

This says it all. This person should simply shut the fuck up and not be a games journalist.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That's like, 95% of games "journalists" these days.

[–] bread@feddit.nl 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Journalists in general have lost an unbelievable amount of credibility, and games bloggers are the bottom of the barrel.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

I think journalists too often have way too little education and way often than not they have no idea what they're talking about. The quality of news is often low. We need better journalism. I was thinking about exactly that just yesterday, by chance.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

Especially from places like RPS and Kotaku.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 6 points 2 months ago

you don't really need to be an avid player to have an opinion on the visuals.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 66 points 2 months ago (3 children)

What a weird passive aggressive headline. A better default is a good thing, and doesn’t stop modders from doing their own thing.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

So long as there's an option to retain the normal experience, especially for those on older hardware that can't run fancier stuff. Then it's all good!

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Everything is rage bait nowadays. It's exhausting.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wait, what makes it passive-aggressive? I didn't interpret the title to sound as anything other than fully positive.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

“You don’t need (and therefore shouldn’t want) this obviously good thing” has this connotation that the Minecraft team has been wasting their time on pointless features, when in reality first-party support for a feature is nearly always more stable than a mod.

Plus read the article, the author is a vehement hater of Minecraft. What a joke.

[–] DesolateMood@lemm.ee 46 points 2 months ago

Original title for anyone who doesn't want to click on the article:

"Minecraft is getting a visual overhaul you probably don't need because of all those mods you've got installed"

[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world 44 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes. All those mods on console that you can get.....

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Aren't there mods? At least texture packs, right?

[–] callyral@pawb.social 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

On console you can get texture packs and add-ons... from the marketplace.

On other bedrock platforms (Windows or Mobile) you can install textures and add-ons from your own files. The problem is that Bedrock add-ons are significantly less capable than Java's mods.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I still have no idea if bedrock or java is the better version after all these years.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Java, and its not even close.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Cool, thank you!

[–] callyral@pawb.social 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Bedrock makes it easier to play with friends, it also has cross-platform support (except for Linux and Mac). Console players can only play on featured servers (unless they use workarounds).

Java is better in most other aspects (I am biased for it though, since it's what I play): you can mod it, play older versions, use custom shaders (with mods), no microtransactions, play on any server you want, (apparently) less game-breaking bugs, etc.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Thanks! It's crazy to me they still keep two versions.

[–] callyral@pawb.social 7 points 2 months ago

Yeah, it is incovenient when you play Java and other people you know play Bedrock (or vice-versa). There is a community-made plugin called Geyser that allows Bedrock players to play on Java servers (it can be buggy sometimes but it is the closest we have to Java-Bedrock crossplay).

[–] MufinMcFlufin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Java is the original and Bedrock is the C++ adaptation that came about once Microsoft bought Minecraft. Microsoft couldn't really justify getting rid of Java edition because that's what the entire PC userbase was using at the time, and they've gotten very used to the features it allows for. Namely mods. However they still wanted to unify the casual playerbase and better monetize the game.

On the topic of monetization, Minecraft originally had this nasty little clause (for Microsoft) written in I forget either the ToS, EULA, or what, but it essentially guaranteed all future updates to the game for free. I believe it also made some other guarantees about no MTX, should never have to pay for servers, etc but those I'm less certain about. Around the time MS bought the game there was a lot of talk about how the only way they'd really be able to get out of that guarantee to the millions of players who already owned "Java edition" (just regular Minecraft back then) was to make a Minecraft 2.0 that didn't have that clause. Their approach for that problem appears to have been bedrock edition which they maintain alongside Java edition. Because it's not the version they bought, they can make changes to the legal agreements including charging for things Java Edition users have a guaranteed right to.

Those are the two main reasons I'm aware of for the two editions. I believe the majority of the PC playerbase is currently on Bedrock Edition so although they would have some backlash if they suddenly decided to axe it I think the majority of the playerbase would chug on like normal. Afaik the main reason they don't is because anyone who purchased Minecraft before there was a "Java Edition" would have a legal claim to say Bedrock is clearly the same game under another title, they're not getting future updates as guaranteed, and are entitled to either updates or compensation. And I can't imagine MS is interested in litigiously pissing off millions of players.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Luanti is the better option IMHO because it's FOSS and therefore more ethical.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Looks pretty cool. Thanks

[–] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 39 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Minecraft is the best-selling game of all time, but it's looked pretty much the same for the entirety of its almost 14 year run

Usually games don't change how they look no matter how long they've been out.

[–] fdrc_lm@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 2 months ago

Also people like Minecraft precisely for its comfy basic aesthetic and vibe in general

[–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 months ago

Hasn't it gone through two or three major texture overhauls anyway?

[–] StupidOriginalName@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Lots of games get remasters. This is an optional visual update, but you don't have to use it.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 months ago

cool, hopefully they don't fuck up the Java release.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Can it handle that? It already runs worse on new beast systems than old versions did on average ones.

[–] mr2meows@pawb.social 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

inb4 java edition becomes unplayable on older systems even with render distance set to lowest

[–] FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe 8 points 2 months ago

Apparently you’ll be able to toggle between the new lighting and the old lighting, so hopefully that isn’t a problem

[–] molten@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

This news site is for PC gaming and it always causes a ruckus when people read their articles and don't know it.

[–] icecreamtaco@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What a shitty title. Consoles will be happy to get this

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

First line in their about us:

Rock Paper Shotgun is about PC gaming.

[–] molten@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

One of the few news sites for PC gaming. The regular readers will probably not be primarily console gamers.

People are trigger happy with the indignation here.

[+] njm1314@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm blind, but I can't see it? The target audience is PC gamers, and even though I rarely browse gaming websites anymore, this type of snark seems to be fairly standard for the last 10+ years.

Minecraft is the best-selling game of all time, but it's looked pretty much the same for the entirety of its almost 14 year run. There's an argument to be made that it's showing its age in places, an argument I won't make because I don't think so myself, but all the same, as revealed during today's Minecraft Live, Mojang announced that the sandbox game is getting a pretty big visual overhaul update called Vibrant Visuals. Now, don't worry, it'll still be all blocks and squares 'n' that, but it will be changing up how lighting looks.

A blog post explains things in a bit more detail, with one of the big things being that there'll now be volumetric lighting. What that translates to is things like sunlight shining more naturally across different surfaces, even shining through windows, and every individual block will cast its own shadow. Mobs and items will glow a bit more too, so it's not just about the overworld lighting.

This update is coming to the Bedrock Edition of the game first, with the post noting that it hopes to bring this "graphics revamp (either fully or partially) to as many devices as possible", though there's not even a release window for it yet. There are plans to bring it to Java Edition too.

I might not have much of a horse in this race as someone that only really plays Minecraft once in a blue moon (and normally swiftly puts it down because I'm not that kind of creative and I get too stressed out from survival mode), but honestly, I'm not a fan. Minecraft is inherently not a natural looking game, and this lighting overhaul just adds a touch to much realism for my tastes. Besides, this kind of lighting already exists in countless mods, so for plenty of people it's not even really needed.

In any case, there were a few other announcements from Minecraft Live too, like the fact you'll soon be able to fly around on friendly versions of ghasts, which I do quite like the look of. There's a live event taking place from March 25 to April 7 too where you get to hang out with Jack Black's version of Steve to defend a village in some mini-games, which'll net you a cape if you're successful. Bit less exciting, but to each their own!