this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
721 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

72212 readers
3171 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The corp I'm working at moved to Outlook Web.

It's so hostile about downloading attachments through anything but OneDrive it's comical.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pahlimur@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

All of Microsoft office products haven't changed for the good in more than a decade. I still use office 2007 on my personal desktop and 90% of the features and buttons are in the same spot as the current office 365 offering.

Only thing that is an improvement is live collaboration, but that's getting constantly screwed up by one drive sucking ass.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

I'm pretty happy with Thunderbird on all my devices. It's not quite perfect, but it's hard to make an argument that Outlook is better. It'd have to be a very specific use case I think.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why are Microsoft employees so fucking stupid?

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

8 thousand executives making product decisions from the top down and trying to cram every facet of the business into every other product.

[–] max_dryzen@mander.xyz 5 points 3 months ago (4 children)

how shielded are enterprise accounts from the data harvest?

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Very much so.

They are paying for the service and expect appropriate treatment.

Companies generally frown upon their data being taken. It’s only consumers who use “free” services that really suffer from this. After all, if you’re not paying you are the product.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The good news is that Outlook doesn't confuse anybody who hasn't used it in years (or never). Last time I did was when I worked at MS. Hasn't been a problem since.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Bullshit, new outlook is total garbage. I dragged a folder inside a folder in the left column and it fucking disappeared. Had to revert back to classic, otherwise folder was in a black hole. Plus other issues like plugins.

I install classic on every computer I setup now.

[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

Microsoft anything = confuses people

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Has anyone tried the new Atari Outlook? You want open that in Atari outlook?

Nah! I use shoelace outlook exclusively. I know its deprecated but just pull the chord a little and it's as good as new!

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (4 children)

As someone that maintains Outlook users, I can’t wait. Dumping decades of garbage code is a godsend.

Most businesses will be fine. The edge case scenarios will bitch and moan but will get over it by the following fiscal quarter.

New outlook will be easier than ever to upgrade. Code security will be better than ever before. Also no more unique software for non-Windows OS’s. OSX and Linux support will be a good feature that’s missing today.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I don't think anybody is arguing against a more efficient product. The issue I see is the multiple, incompatible versions with confusing naming schemes that exist simultaneously.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›