Linux

7420 readers

218 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

Arch Says Goodbye to Redis, Adopts Valkey (linuxiac.com)

submitted 1 month ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/linux@programming.dev

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What took them so long?

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When were the license changes introduced?

[–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Over a year ago. More specifically "March 20th, 2024" from the archlinux.org website.

[–] josh_dix@programming.dev 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think it makes sense to let dust settle imo.

[+] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Fedora did it almost immediately

It is pretty clear Arch doesn't seem to car about shipping license encumbered software

[–] Olap@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

That isn't it's primary reason for existence, and it is essentially a volunteer driven org. And so if no-one was going to adopt the package, we have to wait for the maintainer to find some time. https://archlinux.org/packages/?packager=freswa - here's some of the 167 packages maintained by the last toucher of the Redis package

Thank you Frederik!

[–] badmin@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

There is nothing illegal about packaging Redis, or other open-source projects depending on it, irrespective of jurisdiction.

And Arch has no customers to worry about if they accidentally depend on a package that restricts closed-source commercialization, not that it's a distro's job to pick on that anyway. Commercial entities are supposed to have a process that checks the licenses of all dependencies. If you know how to reliably avoid AGPL, then you know how to reliably avoid RSAL and SSPL.

And I'm liking the cognitive dissonance of dissing Redis while praising Red Hat 🙂

[–] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

the arch maintainers are not terminally online like some of us.

[–] jwt@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago

Prudence.