this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
56 points (66.9% liked)

Privacy

31876 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Open-source tests of web browser privacy.

[EDIT] - Check the comments for more information and links πŸ”½ πŸ”½ πŸ”½

[Edit Edit] - Brave Browser caught adding its own referral codes to some cryptocurrency trading sites - More in the comments πŸ”½ πŸ”½ πŸ”½

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EyesEyesBaby@lemmy.world 101 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

https://aussie.zone/post/1903094

Looking into privacytests.org, the main developer behind it is someone who contributes to Brave source code. He may not be officially affiliated with the company, but it would be hard to ignore any sort of bias towards Brave.

@voytrekk@lemmy.world

(how do you tag someone here?)

[–] Norgur@kbin.social 35 points 2 years ago

Yeah, the tests looked a little suspicious regarding Brave.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Khalic@kbin.social 77 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Stop promoting brave, it’s a scam

[–] Rooki@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

and has an a-hole ceo. It uses chromium so double spyware and dependencies

[–] jasondj@ttrpg.network 1 points 2 years ago
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 years ago

Some of these test cases don't matter if you just use uBlock Origin.

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago

This was garbage every time it was posted before, and it's still garbage.

[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

So at a quick glance Librewolf is the best choice for desktop? Does it allow addons or block ads natively?

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It comes with uBlock Origin preinstalled, so there's that. Otherwise, it's just a hardened Firefox fork, and as such has the same catalogue of addons

[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Awesome. Makes me wonder if there's still a reason to use Firefox over Librewolf.

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Absolutely. I would never recommend any of these offshoots over stock. You can literally set it up the same exact way if you want, but still get same day security patches and updates.

[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Fair enough!

[–] Lemongrab@lemmy.one 6 points 2 years ago

Only reasons if heard is faster updates if you use base Firefox (w/ arkenfix user.js). Also the styling (brand icons and such) for librewolf are detectable. Mullvad is better than librewolf for antfingerprinting.

[–] nick@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago

I switched to it a couple weeks ago from FF/arc. No issues so far, and I’m pretty happy.

[–] Zoidsberg@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

I assume Sync doesn't work for history and bookmarks if its not using the FF servers.

[–] xe3@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes it does both of those things, Librewolf is just Firefox pre-configured for privacy. You could use Librewolf or you could configure firefox yourself to be equally private, Librewolf is just taking advantage of the features built into FIrefox but left optional for users.

[–] lemmyingly@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Do you know of any guides to configure Firefox to be as private as LibreWolf?

[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Librewolf is a custom version of Firefox, focused on privacy

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 16 points 2 years ago

I don't understand the ones where a browser doesn't have the feature so it gets a green dash versus a green check. I'd assume not having a feature should just be considered failing. What's the distinction?

[–] darkbit@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Either the watchers watch eachother, or the great kraken watches us all

https://youtu.be/Fzhkwyoe5vI

[–] AlexKalopsia@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Wish DuckDuckGo was on the list

[–] Lemongrab@lemmy.one 4 points 2 years ago

Its a webview browser so not good for privacy or security and relies on Android webview (a lite chrome widget)

[–] Lemongrab@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago

Look under the ios or android tabs.

[–] izstranger@freeradical.zone 1 points 2 years ago

@AlexKalopsia @ekZepp

It's in the mobile tab

[–] flumph@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why are the three Chrome derivatives missing features Chrome has? Is it a porting issue or are they just that far behind on pulling in upstream changes?

[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They use Chromium, not Chrome. Chrome is Google's proprietary version, while Chromium is the open source version.

[–] Dsklnsadog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

Still pretty proprietary in my books

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί