Only tangentially related, but I find it really frustrating that archaeologists seem to focus so heavily on bone, stone, and metal use to classify the overall technological level of past humans. It seems way more likely to me that ancient human use of wood was probably way ahead of where they were with the other materials. It's just wood rots. Ancient humanity could have had entire civilizations with more advanced tools, structures, systems, etc than bone/stone/metal fragments suggest. Just that they used wood.
this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
4 points (100.0% liked)
Ars Technica - Science
61 readers
1 users here now
Serving the Technologist for more than a decade. IT news, reviews, and analysis.
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS