A place for discussion, camaraderie, and advice.
For, from, and with women. Hi 👋
RULES:
--Be good to one another.
If you're not sure about what you're about to type, ask yourself: Is it true? Is it kind? Is it necessary?
--About, but not only for, women.
We are here to talk about, learn about, and wonder about women and their/our experiences. Men are allowed to post here, but only for the purpose of asking sincere questions about women or for advice related to a women in their lives they are trying to support.
--No bullies. No Creeps. No trolls.
No personal attacks, no misogyny, no misandry, ageism, racism, or otherwise hateful or disrespectful commentary.
--No selling products or services.
You can recommend products/methods that work for you, but soliciting clients or patients is not allowed. No advertising or self-promotions, including using this sub to drive traffic elsewhere.
“… If we continually restrict the freedom of marriage as a legitimate social option, when we do this to people who are a ripe, fertile age and may have a pregnancy and a baby involved, are we not, in fact, making abortion a much more desirable alternative, when marriage might be the right solution for some freedom-loving couples?”
So I guess this is about wanting teenagers to get baby trapped
freedom-loving couples
These fucking people really have a strange definition of the word "freedom". It's like they take any old thing and slap "freedom™ loving" onto it.
And all the other fucking weirdos that don't know what basic words mean go "Ah yes! Freedom! I love freedom! Freedom to lock people up for political opinions. Freedom to dictate to others how they should live their lives. Freedom to force my religion onto others in schools. Freedom to coerce and trap little girls into marriage. And if you don't agree with any of these things, it means you just hate freedom!"
He fucks children.
They all WANT that
If a 16 year old child is old enough to make long term commitments like raising a child of their own and getting married...
Surely they're old enough for something temporary with no long term effects like hormone blockers, right?
OP, why are you posting this now? This is from March 2024, and it's related to ~~the (now dead) bill introduced~~ effort by the New Hampshire GOP to ~~reduce~~ oppose raising the state's marriage age ~~below~~ to 18. Even the post on /c/politics is that old.
Edit: I misremembered this event and wasn't responsible enough to properly verify what I was saying. I'm really sorry.
It's scary and gross how the same issue keeps coming back, frequently and in enough places that we can easily confuse one case for another.
Just yesterday I learned about Hardy Billington, a rep in Missouri. The topic article of the thread mentioned him being in favor of child marriage in April 2025, which made it confusing when I checked his Wikipedia page and saw that the only notable thing on it was when he endorced child marriage last year, in 2024. At first I thought it was about the recent bill, but no - this 70+ year old man really wants underage girls to be able to marry.
Point is, you can be forgiven for confusing similar events. The pedophiles are frickin' everywhere. 😟
Thank you for providing needed clarification!!
Please see my edit. I was irresponsible and did a misinformation.
Good on ya for owning up to it. Respect
Thank-you!!!
Check his hard drive and phone now
Party of pedos gross can we please secede? The west coast wants out of gilliade
My sister is 16 girl is has enough trouble choosing major. Married is off the table.
Next time you Commies LAUGH at a Trump Business CLOSING DOWN due to BIDENS Tariffs just REMEMBER that THIS is Why they Voted for Trump! They want to MARRY CHILDREN NOT LOSE THEIR BUSINESS! HAVE SOME COMPASSION DUMB SOCIALISTS!
Something something not a drag queen again huh?
Vote farming op