this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
271 points (91.2% liked)

Political Memes

8542 readers
1584 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I tried explaining my problems with tankies without calling them tankies. In fact, I used their own terminology to describe my disagreement with them. It, uh... well it doesn't make a lot of sense.

George Orwell fought in the Spanish civil war on the side of the Marxists. His army was betrayed by the Marxist-Leninists. After that experience, he wrote 1984, in which a totalitarian government uses "newspeak" to suppress dissent by suppressing the very ideas that people are capable of communicating. I don't think it's a coincidence that Marxist-Leninists describe their disagreements in terms that turn criticism of them into gibberish. I think it's exactly what Orwell was writing about based on his experiences.

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 32 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This meme describes anarchists. Are you sure you know what the terms mean?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Many anarchists are also communists. So I’m not sure I follow.

[–] Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The subset of communists that do not support a state-backed socialist transition and argue for direct implementations of communism are precisely (mostly) anarchists/libertarians, i think that's what they were saying, so this would be compatible with them being communists.

[–] System_below@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not really. I mean yes Anarchists believe that the state inherently breeds authoritarianism and should not be seized but abolished. However, most Anarchists believe in horizontal systems of governance with no centralisation of power, which is different to communism.

Anarchists believe and they are correct, that Marxism, M-L ect are authoritarian and violent.

[–] Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Communist is a broad word, and i think we have not the same meaning in mind.

To the very core, communism is to think that private property should be abolished. Marx was the most influential thinker of this, and we nowadays call 'communist' all the thinkers and movments that inherit Marx (Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Trotsky, etc.). But anarchists also belong to the very root of communism, they just dont follow Marx (historically, they belonged to the First Internationale and were banned by marxists, with Bakunin as their main figure).

Horizontal system of governance can be communism in its broad sense if there is no private property. This explains some movments like 'libertarian communism', which are closer to anarchism than to marxism. But yes, if we equate communism and marxism, anarchists are no communists.

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

OP is talking about tankies and ML and how he doesn't like them, but the meme he posted doesn't describe those.

alsoAnarchists are communists. No one thinks anarcho-capitalists are anarchist except themselves and those they've misinformed.

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

I'm agender

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No one thinks anarcho-capitalists are anarchist except themselves and those they’ve misinformed.

How isnt anarcho-capitalism a form of ancarchy? Like there's no state, and if some company starts acting like a state, then its not anarchy anymore.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Anarchy isn't just "no state", is also non authority by force. Anarchic capitalists think that companies should rule and impose their will by force.

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

they think that companies should rule and impose their will by force.

at that point it isn't even anarchy though, that's just feudalism. its like a bunch of smaller states

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 month ago

It describes the tankie strawman of anarchists.

[–] GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Marxist-Leninists describe their disagreements in terms that turn criticism of them into gibberish. I think it’s exactly what Orwell was writing about based on his experiences.

Nail on the head. There's a particularly active lemming from the tankie instances that always, and purposefully, devolves everything into arguing about everyone else using words incorrectly.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think this meme is referenced to this quote Orwell wrote after fighting for and living the revolution in Spain.

Except for the small revolutionary groups which exist in all countries, the whole world was determined upon preventing revolution in Spain. In particular the Communist Party, with Soviet Russia behind it, had thrown its whole weight against the revolution. It was the Communist Party thesis that revolution at this stage would be fatal and that what was to be aimed at in Spain was not workers' control, but bourgeois democracy. It hardly needs pointing out why 'liberal' capitalist opinion took the same line.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I need to read up on this. Spain in 1936 seems like one of those points in history that waaaaaay too much shit is quietly connected to. What little I know of it comes from For Whom The Bell Tolls

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Textbook communism is an ideal utopia that can never be achieved.

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, but that's just an attempt at something like communism. They didn't reach full communism.

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 month ago

And also Australia

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

During the Spanish civil war, Catalonia was governed by the Marxists and the Anarchists. They dismantled the state and gave control of the government over to the trade unions. It wasn't perfect, but it was the middle of a war, and they were making progress every month. Until they were betrayed by the Marxist-Leninists.

They were Anarcho-Syndicalist and tbh we have never forgotten them. The collapse of the CNT was one of the greatest tragedies in human history.

[–] LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

So they failed to maintain control?

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

One of the only large-scale “communist” societies that worked, and it was promptly destroyed by authoritarians.

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

Stalin: It's going to be at least another hundred years before I can do communism

Catalonia: Yeah so it's been a few weeks and we're already doing communism. Come visit and shoot a Nazi!

Stalin: Fuck fuck fuck they're making me look bad. Uhhhhhhh destroy Catalonia!

[–] Saryn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Huh? You mean Catalonia in 1936-1937?

Fan of Chomsky I presume?

[–] LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.de -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Read som marxism ABC.

"Normal people are too stupid to achieve communism on their own, so they need to be guided by a vanguard party of corrupt yes-men led by a psychopath."

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

That'd be vanguardism. But that's a component of Leninism, which is itself subset of Marxism.

A part of a part of Marxism probably shouldn't be a working definition of the whole.