this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
80 points (100.0% liked)

HistoryPorn

6952 readers
268 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  4. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Illustrations

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] the_citizen@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Sikorsky went through a long way. Hope I will drive one of it's descendants.

[–] DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Off to find a bit of the ole guzzalean. Cah chunk cah chunk!

[–] Shawdow194@fedia.io 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Amazing how far the design... hasnt come 💀

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But the tail rotor is horizontal?!

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] eRac@lemmings.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It seems a bit odd. The main rotor imparts an opposite spin on the body. Tha tail rotor is there to counteract that spin by blowing sideways. A horizontal one would have to use just its spin, not getting the benefit of the air mass being pushed sideways.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] WaterWaiver@aussie.zone 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That (chinook-style solution) only works if both rotors are the same size and speed.

Perhaps Sikorsky's tethers to the ground worked around the problem for that photo anyway. Not sure.