this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
233 points (97.2% liked)

196

5197 readers
540 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Probably the line about it being illegal for a man to wear women's clothing or a woman to wear the sword of a man, showing their binary view of sex and no separate understanding of gender.

However, that was in the Torah/OT, so it makes sense Jews believe it, but I guess Christians are selective with which laws exactly were abolished.

This is a funny meme though

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 10 points 2 weeks ago

Highly selective in rules followed. So many "wearing blended fabric and going to Hell" fuckers.

[–] Flames5123@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

Most of those laws had a point though. Maybe the clothing one was because women didn’t have pads or tampons so wearing women’s clothing then having sex with her could lead to an infection.

Same with the shrimp and pork and tattoo laws. But we’ve all learned why these laws existed and know more about the world. They aren’t laws for Christians, only unclean people of Abraham 4000 years ago.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

God created man and woman; day and night on a spectrum. Or do these people also deny dawn?

[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean we all know by now that Jesus was a transgender man right?

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No, that's just a theory. A film theory. That I've heard for the first time today. If we don't even know whether Jesus existed, I think his gender is very much not know.

[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Historians generally agree that there was an actual person named Jesus at the place and time described in the Bible. In Biblical canon, Jesus was born to a virgin mother, so he’d have no Y-chromosome on account of having no biological father.