I think the state needs to pick up the bill once they start interfering like that. If you're going to be a monster, you can pay for it.
this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
187 points (99.0% liked)
News
29494 readers
3060 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I am sorry for everyone involved. It is exactly what repubs hope for however: women literally incapable to say no to giving birth to children.
Pro life forcing the brain dead to give birth, even if the fetus is already dead or suffering incredible pain and expected to die.
You wouldn't want to MURDER that poor little fetus when you can force it to be born to SUFFER AND DIE like god intended.
This is the perfect woman according to republicans, literally just a baby making vessel
That's all they're good for! - the gop
Ghoulish, evil, and cruel. All of the trademarks of the Republican Party.
*Ghoulish. Goulash is a dish.
lol, whoops! Damn autocorrect
Between molesting them, destroying Child Labor laws, trying to legalize child brides, and now this shit.. when it comes to traumatizing children, Republicans are the GOAT
When it comes to republican poilicy, cruelty is the point.
Awful, it makes me sick. I hope all women can flee this shithole of a country.
Georgiastan
There's nobody to speak for the woman either way. This wouldn't be a clear issue in any state.
This is when jacking someone up against the wall and forcing them to do it, IS. The right call. Help the woman , for fucks sJe
Yes, generally if a mother was pregnant and now she's braindead, it makes sense to keep her alive until her child is born, but if you read the article, the fetus suffered complications and is likely braindead as well, so it might be a stillbirth or just suffer and not live for very long, so it's a bit more complicated
no, its not. In no case should a woman in this condition be forced to carry to full term. I am not trying to be antagonistic, I just really disagree.
I guess I misunderstood what you meant. I stand by my words though: If a mother, who wanted the child, is now all of a sudden braindead, it makes a lot of sense to try to save the baby. This is of course not the case in the article, because the fetus is not in good conditions and probably dead already, so I agree in this case it makes no sense.