this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
23 points (100.0% liked)

PC Master Race

16950 readers
4 users here now

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘stupid’ questions. The world won’t be made better or worse by snarky comments schooling naive newcomers on Lemmy.

Notes:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
_MoveSwiftly@lemmy.world
The_Vampire@lemmy.world
Fudgeknuckles98@lemmy.world
Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world
IowaMan@lemmy.world
BobaFett26@lemmy.world
CatZoomies@lemmy.world
Xeon@lemmy.ml
geosoco@kbin.social
23
Changes to wolfgang's PSU low idle efficiency source. (programming.dev)
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by dirtycrow@programming.dev to c/pcmasterrace@lemmy.world
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I needed a PSU that was efficient at 20W and so I consulted Wolfgang's PSU Low Idle Efficiency List, because it was one of the first results on YouTube. However, the first thing you may notice is that the reports it links to are no longer in the same place on Cybenetics' website. If you manually check the PSU model on their website, you actually get different numbers for 20W. After having this revelation, I scraped the entire website and found that Wolfgang's data is no longer current. I don't know why after a second evaluation Cybenetics had different results, but am inviting you to ask with me.

Here are the top 150:

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] infeeeee@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I mean why 20W?

[–] dirtycrow@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago (3 children)

NAS. 1 drive = maybe 8 watts. Motherboard itself = 12w.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

So with 20W DC draw, a PSU at 85% vs 90% efficiency would be a difference of 1.29W from the wall. Probably not worth spending more money on that 5% difference, but for the same price might as well get the best you can.

[–] infeeeee@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why does it matter?

[–] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Power ain't cheap, especially in a NAS configuration where it'll presumably be running 24/7.

[–] vonxylofon@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Power is cheaaaaaap https://www.globalpetrolprices.com/electricity_prices/ unless you pull like 100 W. Having said that, I'd go for ARM or x86 SoC that pull like 15 W through a wall wart as opposed to a full ATX PSU.

[–] infeeeee@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

1.3 W is around 1 kWh per month. I checked on local electric company's website, that's around 0.2 USD per year here. Prices may be diffferent wildly worldwide, but we are definitely speaking about a less than 10 USD difference yearly.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

A NAS with only 1 drive? Is that a thing?

[–] dirtycrow@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago

It's a 3-2-1 backup, one drive is 16tb and the other is a backup that turns on once a week. If one drive fails they're under warranty. Files are also uploaded to the cloud.