this post was submitted on 18 May 2025
470 points (98.6% liked)

THE POLICE PROBLEM

3065 readers
162 users here now

    The police problem is that police are policed by the police. Cops are accountable only to other cops, which is no accountability at all.

    99.9999% of police brutality, corruption, and misconduct is never investigated, never punished, never makes the news, so it's not on this page.

    When cops are caught breaking the law, they're investigated by other cops. Details are kept quiet, the officers' names are withheld from public knowledge, and what info is eventually released is only what police choose to release — often nothing at all.

    When police are fired — which is all too rare — they leave with 'law enforcement experience' and can easily find work in another police department nearby. It's called "Wandering Cops."

    When police testify under oath, they lie so frequently that cops themselves have a joking term for it: "testilying." Yet it's almost unheard of for police to be punished or prosecuted for perjury.

    Cops can and do get away with lawlessness, because cops protect other cops. If they don't, they aren't cops for long.

    The legal doctrine of "qualified immunity" renders police officers invulnerable to lawsuits for almost anything they do. In practice, getting past 'qualified immunity' is so unlikely, it makes headlines when it happens.

    All this is a path to a police state.

    In a free society, police must always be under serious and skeptical public oversight, with non-cops and non-cronies in charge, issuing genuine punishment when warranted.

    Police who break the law must be prosecuted like anyone else, promptly fired if guilty, and barred from ever working in law-enforcement again.

    That's the solution.

♦ ♦ ♦

Our definition of ‘cops’ is broad, and includes prison guards, probation officers, shitty DAs and judges, etc — anyone who has the authority to fuck over people’s lives, with minimal or no oversight.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

Real-life decorum is expected. Please don't say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.

If you're here to support the police, you're trolling. Please exercise your right to remain silent.

Saying ~~cops~~ ANYONE should be killed lowers the IQ in any conversation. They're about killing people; we're not.

Please don't dox or post calls for harassment, vigilantism, tar & feather attacks, etc.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

It you've been banned but don't know why, check the moderator's log. If you feel you didn't deserve it, hey, I'm new at this and maybe you're right. Send a cordial PM, for a second chance.

♦ ♦ ♦

ALLIES

!abolition@slrpnk.net

!acab@lemmygrad.ml

r/ACAB

r/BadCopNoDonut/

Randy Balko

The Civil Rights Lawyer

The Honest Courtesan

Identity Project

MirandaWarning.org

♦ ♦ ♦

INFO

A demonstrator's guide to understanding riot munitions

Adultification

Cops aren't supposed to be smart

Don't talk to the police.

Killings by law enforcement in Canada

Killings by law enforcement in the United Kingdom

Killings by law enforcement in the United States

Know your rights: Filming the police

Three words. 70 cases. The tragic history of 'I can’t breathe' (as of 2020)

Police aren't primarily about helping you or solving crimes.

Police lie under oath, a lot

Police spin: An object lesson in Copspeak

Police unions and arbitrators keep abusive cops on the street

Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States

So you wanna be a cop?

When the police knock on your door

♦ ♦ ♦

ORGANIZATIONS

Black Lives Matter

Campaign Zero

Innocence Project

The Marshall Project

Movement Law Lab

NAACP

National Police Accountability Project

Say Their Names

Vera: Ending Mass Incarceration

 

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world 130 points 5 days ago

Good. You know the cops are going to hide everything they can and hope he'll just get buried under assumptions and persuasions.

Remember:

  1. Luigi is innocent. The state and federal governments must prove to a jury he's guilty.
  2. disinformation is rampant.
  3. both governments NEED a scapegoat to appease the rich, who are actually afraid of a movement.
  4. cops, the NYC mayor, and the prosecutors are sloppy. They've already made mistakes, and want to hide them.

Free Luigi!

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 97 points 5 days ago (2 children)

"FOIA" - "Freedom of Information Act", for anyone wondering

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Fun fact: Anyone can file a FOIA request. You don't even have to be American.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't know why all of that information isn't just public to begin with.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 9 points 4 days ago

Because it would cause too much societal whiplash to, all at once, we see a transformation from a world where information like this is closed away, to a world where it's all public. Often the accessibility of information depends on logistics like where data should be stored, and whether something counts as "public" if some information can only be accessed by, let's say, booking an appointment to see paper records only available at an archive.

FOI are a concession. Legislation that allows them is how we bridge the gap between the abstract political ideology of "this information should be public", and the pragmatic challenge of information infrastructure. That is to say that you're entirely right, and that information obtainable via FOIA should just be public info. However, submitting skillful FOIAs can be a powerful tool towards making more information free generally — more FOIA requests being made can encourage organisations to revamp their information management such that they can fulfill FOIA requests more easily (perhaps even making information available to pre-empt such requests). Repeatedly non-compliant organisations may be forced to comply, if held accountable by an effective information commissioner or ombudsman. (That's a big "if").

In short, they're a step towards pushing for more widespread, public information

[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 12 points 5 days ago

Thank you !

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 36 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Good! Go for the source
Hottaketimes for the win

They had to try to convince me to be religious.

At some point I realized they weren’t trying to “teach” me. They were trying to “convince” me. All while clearly unconvinced themselves.

I began equating “sales effort” with “lying” at a very early age, but i digress

So they tried to convince me to be religious. No one tried to convince me to be atheist. I just was.

They are really trying to convince me that Luigi is some bad dude.

No one is trying to convince me that he’s a hero. He just is.

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago

They keep showing a picture of someone that is supposed to look like a criminal. All I ever see is a hero.

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Malfunctions/Misplacements incoming