A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
Crossposted from: https://lemmy.world/post/29870566
Grassy trams are better than dead asphalt, but monoculture lawns are still not the best. I'm not sure what the best translation of the official name would be, but I guess meadowy tram would fit. Much lower maintenance and increased resilience to heat and dryness are nice bonuses.
This is a 1km stretch of tramline 13 running through a park in Helsinki, Finland.
So, it's intentionally kept like this? Doesn't that lead to increased maintence? And upkeep from needing to be mowed?
Maybe they run a big ass mower under the tram.
Grass would be more of a hassle. Once the plants have properly rooted down, the tracks shouldn't need any watering or routine cutting. I'm guessing that the trams themselves prevent most of the plants from growing too long. As can be seen in the first picture there, the plants between the rails are shorter than those between and outside the two tracks.
