this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
45 points (83.6% liked)

Technology

70249 readers
3822 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Seeing title:

revolutionary

Rule: when someone claims a revolutionary product, it's probably bullshit as I see revolutionary product announcements about twice a day and real revolutions about once every decade at best.

Reading article:

Yeap, this is something somewhere in some lab that one day maybe a decade from now find its way into a consumer product, but probably not air conditioners anyway...

For the moment it sort of sounds sort of like a Peltier cooler, which also is useless for airconditioning

[–] xodoh74984@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I searched for "nitinol cooling system" and found articles dating back to 2016 about the same technology at a German university –

https://newatlas.com/shape-memory-refrigerant-free/41652

https://newatlas.com/shape-memory-alloy-nitinol-heating-cooling/58837/

Cool tech, but this recent article lacks substance compared to the older ones. Also interesting that the German team claimed 2x better efficiency than a typical heat pump.

[–] sturger@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

You know what's even cheaper to run than this "new technology"? Breathy promotion pieces that give no evidence whatsoever to support it's claims. Way to go, PR folks.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Good for Slovenia.

[–] Vitaly@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is this cheaper to run more expensive to buy type of deal? If so I want one of those

[–] calabast@lemm.ee 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It says the current tech is only 15% efficient vs current AC which is 20-30%, so no it would be more expensive to run. Since it doesn't exist as a product yet, we can't really compare initial installation costs, and probably not maintenance costs either. Hopefully they can improve on the efficiency, but there may be a theoretical maximum efficiency and I have no idea if that's higher than 30% or not

[–] pelya@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah, you could probably achieve 15% cooling efficiency with regular old nitrogen or methane instead of fluorocarbons.

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Extremely interesting. Some technical challenges remain, but so many applications if solved.