this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
4 points (83.3% liked)

General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”)

145 readers
11 users here now

Everything related to the #GDPR is discussed here. This is the first and only community specifically for GDPR topics which is decentralized and outside of walled-gardens. #EDPB recommendations and guidance can and should also be discussed here.

For the moment, chatter on the similar California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) could be discussed at least until the volume of messages compels us to split it into a separate community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Indeed, MS only makes GDPR rights available to people who are willing and able to solve their graphical CAPTCHA. You must execute their JavaScript and have image rendering enabled in your browser.

For sighted people it’s not the more shitty varieties of CAPTCHA. Looks easy. But still fucked up that there is a barrier to exercising GDPR rights.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mormund@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think you are allowed to send an email (or even real mail!) to any address publicly associated with the company and they are required to handle it appropriately. Means, you can get the address from the impressum/about page (which they are also legally required to have) and send it there.

[–] debanqued@beehaw.org 1 points 1 week ago

Every method has a barrier:

  • snail mail: requires postage, which is particularly costly if you need proof of delivery. Also generally entails revealing your physical address to the controller.
  • email: requires revealing your email address to them. And if the recipient is MS or Google, or a user on those platforms, their mail server is fussy. I cannot email any MS or Google users because their server blocks my mail server.

A webform could potentially have the fewest barriers, but they blew it.