this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
376 points (91.6% liked)

News

29494 readers
2920 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] carrion0409@lemm.ee 11 points 4 hours ago

Once again Bernie is spitting facts. At this point the DNC is just a make a wish party for the elderly. They dont actually care about anything as long as it doesn't prevent them from getting more money. I sincerely hope the party fails and we get something better in it's place but knowing our luck these ass clowns will continue to fail upward.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago

He's absolutely right with this current Democratic party and it's shitty leadership.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I'm shocked .world is keeping this one up.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Because Sanders isn't a Real Progressive^TM and actually smart enough to acknowledges one can both be critical of the current Democratic party and leadership while accepting the reality in actual daily life in America and its citizens.

However, Sanders did strongly disagree with one of his host’s points when Schulz expressed disappointment that, despite being sidelined by the establishment, Sanders continued to back Democratic nominees like Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Kamala Harris in 2024.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Sanders got cheated and still worked for the winners. Sanders did more speeches for Clinton than he did for himself on the campaign tour. Sanders knew that the DNC was the only major party that had a major chance defeat Trump.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Yeah, the Democratic leadership is completely corrupt and inept at this point and they did every every progressive presidential candidate dirty these past decade. And yeah it's really sad and sickening that even now they're thrashing like crazy and doing everything they can to resist progressive influence, trying to keep their wealthy donors happy, look at what their trying to do with Hogg.

But yeah, I do really agree with Sanders that Democrats, with all of their major character and leadership flaws, realistically is the only way to beat Trump and the Republicans.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee -1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

isn't this Ben Shaprio newspaper?

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

No. You are thinking of The Daily Wire.

[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (12 children)

He isn't wrong. If they hadn't pushed a senile 81 year old incumbent leader upon us as their candidate, in a blatant attempt to parachute an unpopular vice president into power once the 25th Amendment had to inevitably be invoked, then we would never have had a second Trump term.

Biden should never have ran for a second term, and allowed time for the Democrats to field a decent candidate for the White House. The fact that Harris literally lost to somebody who tried to stir up an insurrection against Congress four years ago says it all.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Harris didn't lose. Trump didn't win. They stole the election through every single means available. There is clear data that shows they tried it in 2020, and failed. They perfected it in 2024. "If I win you'll never need to vote again." "Elon knows sic. [everything] about the machines, he'll make sure we win."

Voting won't save us now. Self defense and community defense are all we have left. The system has been stolen by the ultra rich, and they are gleefully enacting as much violence against us all as they want, because they "know" they don't have to listen to us anymore.

https://sdvoice.info/trump-lost-vote-suppression-won-here-are-the-numbers/

https://youtu.be/UgIay64Obcs

https://youtu.be/t-yr-Mgkhm0

https://electiontruthalliance.org/eta

First and last links are the data. The middle links are for us stupid people that need to be told how to read the data in the last link.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Yeah a little too late Bernie. You'll tell us to vote for Gavin Newsom/Liz Cheney 2028 as well. The modern Dem party is an enrichment cult.

[–] mcv@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago

And he'd be right to, if the alternative is MAGA.

But this is the buf problem un US politics. Of course you should vote against Trump, and of course even the most questionable Democrat is preferable to Trump. But with only two options, that seems to have lead the Democrats to think they don't even have to try anymore. They keep drifting further to the right, instead of running a credible opposition.

The US desperately needs more options, but the system is rigged to allow only two credible parties. To change, there are only two options: seize control of the Democratic Party, primary every lackluster candidate, until the DNC can't ignore that people demand better. Or start a new grassroots party, but it would have to be universally seen as the only way to get change, it needs to be massively funded to take on the machines of the other two parties, and convince the American voter that they really can win in this system that's rigged against the people.

Primarying is certainly the more likely option, but you need to do it everywhere.

With his recent moves you couldn't pay me to vote for Gavin

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nothing like clickbait headlines using a right-wing podcaster to put words in Bernie's mouth.

Oh, Return2Ozma? Who would've guessed.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Who's the right wing podcaster? If you think it's Benny Boy, that's not his website.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Who’s the right wing podcaster? If you think it’s Benny Boy, that’s not his website.

Who the fuck is "Benny Boy"?

Andrew Schulz is a conservative.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Ben Shapiro, I thought that was a more common nickname.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Why would he be relevant here, though.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Someone else here thought The Daily Beast was The Daily Wire. I was trying to ensure you weren't thinking of the wrong publication. Thank you for saying who the right winger is.

[–] Gregg@lemm.ee 71 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

They really are at an impasse. Do they do the right thing for the good of their constituents or do they continue to line their pockets with corporate ~~bribes~~ donations?

[–] Mouette@jlai.lu 23 points 1 day ago

Response C: Both, spend 1 year pretending they care right before the election, then spend 4 year lining their pocket 👍

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I didn't read the article or listen to podcast. Just came to say 2 party system doesn't work. Thank you. Cheers.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

well hey used to it, several red states passed laws banning rank choice voting

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Worked pretty well for the capitalists and fascists.

Bernie, a notorious independent.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

Andrew Schulz

You might not know the name. But I bet you recognize what Kendrick said about him:

Don't let no white comedian talk about no Black woman, that's law

I know propaganda work for them, and fuck whoever that's close to them

But Bernie's always went to where all the earballs are, he's just trying to get the message out.

And I think it's important to point out by "party" Bernie is talking about elected politicians in leadership positions, not the DNC.

Sanders echoed his woes, venting that even after losing the 2024 election, his colleagues still “won’t listen” to him about how to appeal to voters.

Also:

Singh interjected with another question: “But could we not also say, if there hasn’t been a fair primary for the Democrats since 2008, are they not also a threat to democracy?”

“Fair enough,” Sanders answered. “I’m not gonna argue with that.”

First off, the headline wasn't Bernie's words, he was just moving on from something a rightwing podcaster had said.

2008 wasn't a fair primary, Obama just won in spite of it. The DNC being biased against him not only in the primary but the general is why Obama didn't appoint a DNC chair, so the neoliberals maintained their death grip on the DNC till just a few months ago.

But Obama refusing to nominate a chair was probably his biggest mistake, one we're still paying for.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Also important to note that Bernie defends voting for Democrats in this interview.

“Because it’s easy to say,” said Sanders. “But ‘burning it down’ means children will not have food to eat. The schools will deteriorate. People will not have healthcare. I’m an elected official. I’ve got to represent the people. I can’t turn my back on them.”

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 31 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Bernie has the greatest leverage in a potential third party, though with the system we have I think it'll just lead to the left losing again because of a voter split.

Assuming the elections will be fair with trump around, he effectively bypassed court already, he can adjust procedures to solidify his successor

[–] match@pawb.social 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

he or AOC could announce their third party run now and demand the democratic left get behind them in advance

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

form a coalition with them or else.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›