That looks cool, but maybe not $250 a month cool.
this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
14 points (73.3% liked)
ChatGPT
9630 readers
21 users here now
Unofficial ChatGPT community to discuss anything ChatGPT
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Given you would need to pay actors and a production team to do this conventionally, $250/m is massively undercutting the cost of a human created equivalent.
Even if this produces shit half the time, there's enough greedy marketing agency owners out there that will be thinking they can save tens of thousands a month in salary by gutting their video production teams
Cherrypicked and even these have issues.
It is progress I guess.
Less than two years ago AI couldn't make an image of a person with the right amount of fingers.
Now we are here. In two years AI video could produce a TV show or movie.
AI has been able to make pictures with the right amount of fingers for about four years. It involved cherry picking and sometimes inpainting. The biggest thing that’s changed is resolution and prompt adherence.
Even the best models sometimes (frequently) give people extra fingers.
It was fast, for sure, but tv shows in two years are very unlikely. If we could get at least more consistent results and better character control, that would already be a lot
It will be funny when someone maps this to the scenes/characters they are training it on.