this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
37 points (93.0% liked)

Firefox

5406 readers
3 users here now

A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)
  1. Things I don't use like multiple search engines
  2. Hiding HTTPS: stupid idea I guess but I'm waiting for someone to prove me wrong

Overall, I have the feeling that they made changes for changes' sake but I may be wrong. Anyway, they lost (again) 10k users this year and I don't understand how those changes would help (https://data.firefox.com/dashboard/user-activity)

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 weeks ago

My reason for liking the hiding of https is that it will still make it obvious when the website you're visiting in http, so there isnt much downside, and it lets you see more of long urls, since you no longer have the http taking up space at the beginning

[–] Ragnor@feddit.dk 2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Also, if Firefox sends me to a Google search instead of the web page I typed in the address bar as much as a single time, I'm switching to something else.

I've been using Firefox for about 25 years.

[–] dumblederp@aussie.zone 1 points 4 weeks ago

I have my Firefox default search set to qwant.

[–] TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not saying I disagree, but does the average use have to worry about HTTPS though? The vast majority of sites use it now and most users aren't very privacy or security conscious (even if they should be).

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

does the average use have to worry about HTTPS though?

Yes, but arguably this will make it more clear when what they are doing is insecure.

As you mentioned the majority of sites use HTTPS, which is good. Most of the time users will never notice anything. But on occasion, when a site is insecure, they'll have a warning.

If every site were insecure, everyone would ignore the warning. If only a few rare sites are insecure, someone may notice.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

Every single one of these is an upgrade in my view.

I have been cynical about search integration with browsers, but I feel like it's a necessity in life at this point; and search engines have become so unreliable that I think it's important now to spread out and use more than one, for me anyways

I love that I can do quick toolbar searches with @history and @bookmarks and although I don't think I would use it much, it's nice to know that you can shortcut common browser commands instead of having to go through multiple menus.

[–] bright_side_@lemmy.world -1 points 4 weeks ago

Great to see Firefox getting cool features again