this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
55 points (96.6% liked)

World News

47277 readers
2574 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • The proposed railway would connect Brazil to a new port on Peru's Pacific coast, creating a trade route with China that would allow it avoid routes going through the Panama Canal and around the southern tip of South America.
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anybody know why this would be better than the Nicaragua canal for China? For Brazil it is clearly good, because it increases the access for its deepest, landlocked parts.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because a railroad is much cheaper and easier to build than a canal through mountains and jungles.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Rail is pretty hard to build and operate through the Andes and can't reach the scale of sea freight, which could be achieved through a Nicaragua canal, but fine, it is not meant to compete with the Panama canal, so no need to build another canal.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 1 week ago

Meh, I thought is a railway crossing two oceans.