this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
134 points (97.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3133 readers
1431 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas!

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Counterpoint: We've tried a lot and there's no magic fix to this issue.

The objective truth is that there are far more gun laws in the United States today than there was 60 years ago. To give a single example; in 1968 you could literally mail order a firearm directly to your doorstep. No background check, no registry, no nothing. In fact that's how Lee Harvey Oswald got the rifle he used to shoot President Kennedy.

Yet despite the vast increase in firearms laws both the Homicide and Suicide by firearm rates in 2023 are very close to 1968.

You can argue that we haven't done enough but to say that we've tried nothing is completely ridiculous.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Counterpoint: the rest of the world.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, of course, you're right, there's no difference whatsoever between the per capita firearms deaths and that article completely invalidates my point.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then you should have made that argument instead of stepping forward with the weak sauce you used.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

I didn't bother referencing a source for the same reason I wouldn't bother if we were talking about how common sugar is in processed food. Nowhere else has the issues with guns the US has. Everyone who doesn't live under a rock knows that.

The Onion has a set article that they republish constantly about school shootings because it's such a shambles.

So no, I didn't, because I respected your intelligence enough to assume you'd know. The US' relationship with firearms is a massive outlier and causes huge amounts of preventable deaths.

We hold these truths to be self-fucking-evident.

[–] match@pawb.social -3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

send the government door to door taking the guns away

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Uh huh, so Cops going door to door to take the guns away from the 24% of Black and 15% of Latinos who own them. I'm sure that would go super well! Excellent suggestion! /s

[–] match@pawb.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the suggestion is tongue-in-cheek in that i think it will specifically not go well for the cops

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It ain't gonna go well for the folks at home either. Your "tongue-in-cheek" comment is a thin veneer over brutality, violence, and death on a massive scale. Literally tens of millions of people.

It isn't clever and it isn't funny.

[–] match@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yeah, it's not, I'm mostly just sad about how america is right now

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

America right now is somehow simultaneously the best its ever been and enormously fucked up. I'm in my 50s and the amount of positive change, particularly social, I've experienced in my lifetime is incredible.

There are definitely problems that need solved, Gun Violence is one of them, but the story of America isn't over. We're in a period of turmoil right now but we'll come out of it better than what we started. Just like we have before.

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

maybe if we keep deregulating the guns will shoot themselves

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The funniest thing is that if you debate a 2A person they will swear that they personally keep up with their training and keep all weapons fully secured. Then they will explain how forcing anyone else to take these common sense precautions is a horrible idea.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It depends. I heard someone talking about how they have one on the coffee table, nightstand, and like 2 other places in the open.

[–] amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 month ago

Not to play devils advocate, but I think what qualifies safe storage is super situational. What you describe could be totally fine in a house without children or a person with a disability.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Arguing with a 2A person is kinda like arguing with a obese person. They always eat healthy and move a lot and have no idea where these calories may come from.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

I'm going to use that analogy. Thank you.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then they will explain how forcing anyone else to take these common sense precautions is a horrible idea.

Using Government Power to force people to do things often has unexpected consequences. Since Black Teens are the single largest group effected by Firearm Homicides, pages 5 and 8, and are almost certainly included in this study as children, that means The Police are going to have to go into Black homes to "force" these common sense precautions.

Uhhhh....I see some problems here.

It's too easy, especially online, to have an image of "2A people" as older white males but the reality is pretty different. Yes 36% of Whites reporting owning a firearm but so do 24% of Blacks and 15% of Latinos.

That is literally 10s of millions of non-white gun owners and as you can see on page 10 in the Johns Hopkins study data the problem of gun violence is massively skewed towards non-whites.

Yes every gun owner needs to take appropriate measures to secure their firearms but how in the hell do you "force" that without ending up in very problematic situations?

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thanks for proving my point.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep, but I did it with that official statics and impeccable logic not hand-waving vagueness.

I also noticed that you didn't answer my question.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

That's how you proved my point.

Millions and millions of 'responsible gun owners' donating to hundreds of politicians, and yet they can't come up with anything like a plan to stop even one kid from getting shot.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's because NOT ENOUGH Kids are using Guns! We need Hospitals to give Babies FREE GUNS using Taxpayer Money every time they're Born! THEN we'll FINALLY Start seeing these numbers go NOT UP!

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 2 points 1 month ago

Have we tried more guns yet?