this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
558 points (98.4% liked)

/0

2018 readers
6 users here now

Meta community. Discuss about this lemmy instance or lemmy in general.

Service Uptime view

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey m@tes, as y'all know, this instance has been anti-corporate GenAI positive since it's creation and as such we've typically allowed such content to be posted freely. However in the last few weeks we've had a bunch of drama from GenAI haters who insist on coming into our comms and starting slap-fights. This caused us to vote on a new rule to have the mandate to clear out this constant friction. This worked to an extent, but I think we can help foster a better community with the larger threadiverse.

One issue a lot of anti-GenAI people keep bringing is that while they can block dedicated comms like !stable_diffusion_art@lemmy.dbzer0.com, they don't have an easy option to avoid GenAI content in random other /0 comms as there's no way to filter it out. This kind of content has been seen to cause a lot of strife, because people complain about its existence, while /0 admins and mods based on the above rule, tend to sanction those complaining. This then causes drama loops with /c/YPTB and /c/FuckAI etc.

There is a good point to be made here that while we don't mind GenAI content in /0, there isn't a reason to not help others avoid it. So we want to institute the following soft rule by now:

Simply tag your posts which consist of primarily GenAI content with the [GenAI] tag in their title. Not only will frontends like Tesseract will natively parse this as a tag and display it accordingly, but people who dislike such content, can simply filter it out of their feeds. Eventually lemmy will add tags which will make this tagging more seamless, but for now a manual tag in the title will suffice.

This rule only applies to posts in non-explicit GenAI comms. The assumption is that people can simply block those comms completely anyway.

As I said, this is a soft rule for now. Soft in the sense that you're not going to be sanctioned for forgetting it, but we hope people will remind you to do so. This is a good-faith attempt by us to co-exist and help others avoid what they don't want to stumble onto, much like [NSFW] tags. So I hope you'll add do a good faith attempt to help us in this. Furthermore, people who come to posts tagged as GenAI explicitly to scold and start slap-fights, will give the admins and easier justification to clean up, since they could have just filtered out that content in the first place.

Cheers

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (15 children)

What about that mod banning people from ai communities before they could block the community?

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

I don't really see the issue with that, its just a mod doing that, no admins.

I don't think anyone annoyed about being banned from there wanted to engage with the community properly anyway.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 weeks ago

IMO the problem is a lack of tags on Lemmy, which are often used as content warnings. With a robust tagging system, people would be able to filter out tags they dislike, such as genAI or politics.

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

People should do this for stuff they generated with llms too. Realistically English needs evidentials, like tenses that explain the source.

Much unintentional disinformation would be cleared up if people stated the source. E.g. "I remember learning..." "Someone I trust told me..." "I heard an expert say..." "a statistical text generator emitted..." "a random internet comment said..."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RizzoTheSmall@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ok, so should we tag this post or did y'all draw that pic?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] leMe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

Great! proper tagging and content description helps everyone 👏

[–] zaknenou@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

it seems to be for the better imo

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

That wasn't very Anarchy of you. /joke

[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 weeks ago

This is what they are gonna call cyborgs born in the year 2100

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›