this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
1087 points (97.2% liked)

People Twitter

8357 readers
1611 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived Post

https://archive.ph/vzrga

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It worked so well the first two times. Why not try again?

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Third times a charm?

[–] mintiefresh@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

Will it even matter?

[–] justmember88@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

He has avoided impeachments with way better justifications, but sure, go ahead.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

For what? For doing what the USA does best?

[–] ALilOff@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

If we have to rely on the house or senate to impeach him, that’s not going to happen.

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

This will totally work.

And yes, I know its bait.

[–] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Didn't they dangle an "impeachment" so many times the last time it literally stopped meaning anything? I see thru this game and I ain't buying it.

[–] EverXIII@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

A sraight jacket would be a better solution.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›