this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
187 points (99.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

7587 readers
58 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

These Am-180s fuck tho, affectionately nicknamed 'a swarm of angry bees.' Forgotten weapons has a good video on it

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Laser rifles need a portable power source. Given that a 25 lb. backpack two-stroke leaf blower engine generates 4 HP, assume the military can put together a power pack. It might either be a 50 lb., 10 HP generator backpack that includes a gallon fuel tank, or a 50 lb. Lithium-Ion battery generating the same power.

From: "Laser Rifles are Coming" - American Handgunner

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Once, I actually had my hands on a German WWII-era infrared targeting... wand? Scope? ... It was a huge shoulder-mounted flashlight with optics that were used to illuminate aircraft using IR. VERY sophisticated for the time. According to the declassified doc that came with it, the power requirements were insane. Basically it had to be plugged into a mobile generator - probably on a truck or half-track - or the grid, to use it.

So it's not out of the question. G.I. Joe in an alternate WWII timeline could have had laser sights on machine guns, provided they were tethered to a "mobile" power supply like that.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

Less "electric rifle," more "optical flamethrower."

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago
[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago

Looks like the times before semiconductor lasers. Gas lasers take up space.

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 8 points 3 days ago

Read that as "2 ISO rounds per minute" and that made it even better.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago

Honestly, just lie and say 36 rounds per second. Or go whole hog with 129000 round per hour.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

Would we say a megahertz-pulsed laser fires a million rounds per minute?

Because if that drum is full of bullets it has less staying power than Juicy Fruit gum.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 3 days ago

That's a big fuckin' laser.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How quickly do you need to reload to keep up that rate of fire?

[–] LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The 180's drum mag can carry about 180 rounds of .22lr, so if you held the trigger down you'd dump the mag in around 5 seconds.

[–] SolOrion@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

5 seconds of fun for every 10 minutes of reloading.