this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
137 points (89.6% liked)

Tragedeigh: shitty baby names

153 readers
201 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can't surely keep track. I get lost after the Q.

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

2SLGBTQIANBP+ or LGBTQIANB2SP+

  • Two Spirit
  • Lesbian
  • Gay
  • Bisexual
  • Transgender
  • Queer/Questioning
  • Intersex
  • Asexual/Aromantic/Agender (never for allies)
  • Nonbinary
  • Pansexual/Polyamorous
  • Plus (for other identities)
[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's why people should just settle for queer.

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 18 hours ago

Queer is slightly contentious in some ways (and we don't mean it having been a slur previously), but yeah, generally better.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

No way in my fucking life I'll be able to remember all of that. I'll need a cheat sheet.

$ cat /dev/random

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 14 hours ago

feeding random device into your cat and then string it up is cat abuse /j

[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I guess it's pretty discriminating that some orientations get more letters than others, one even is allowed to have a number and potentially many more have to share just one single +. Why not use only the + for everyone? ♥️

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

This is why most of us just use 'queer' nowadays, even though it's not very accurate in some ways for some people.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Personally think GSRM should be more popular. Its short and includes everyone, and isnt making a a hidden declaration that some minorities are more special by having their own letter (thus the reason for appending more to the alphabet soup)

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 18 hours ago

We believe it was coopted by pedophiles or they tried to claim it for themselves or join in with using it in some way, so sadly there's a lot of baggage which comes with it and why any in the know don't use it.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 1 points 22 hours ago

Thanks for teaching-me-about/reminding-me-of that acronym.

I've been advocating for the adoption of "people with minority Sexual Orientations and/or Gender Identities" ie "SOGI minorities" or "SOGIm".

I think I still prefer " SOGI minorities" because it's inclusive, and the acronym sort of stands on it's own e.g. I recently learned my province has SOGI curriculum as part of the school system. It's not just about SOGI minorities, it's about helping kids understand what gender is, and isn't.

I do like how GSRM articulates the difference between sexuality and romance though.

How is bryightnleigh supposed to be pronounced? Briton-Lee?

[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

White people have some really bad names. Only a white woman would name her kid khaleesi.

Guy I know worked ers. Kid named Nosmo. The mother looked up, saw the no smoking sign, said that sounds good.

As far as names go it's better than the white ones lmao.

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

[Sincere] Apart from it being a reference and sounding appropriative in some ways what's wrong with Khaleesi?

[–] moody@lemmings.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's fairly common for parents to name their children based on the day they were born, like naming them after the saint that day represents.

I met a guy who's name was the equivalent to "nat-hol" because he was born on the local national holiday and that's what it showed on the calendar for that day.

These people are naming children like animals.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

To be fair lgb and lgb+ was a lot easier. Its practically doubled over time. Is the Q even needed? I thought queer was a slur.

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It's lgbt, not lgb. And queer is a reclaimed slur.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 18 hours ago

gotta realize I have experience going back to the 70's. I could be wrong but I swear it was lgb at one point.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

I looked it up and the Q can stand for "queer" or "questioning". I've always assumed it was the second for the exact reason you mentioned. It has been, at least in part, reclaimed, although it probably differs from group to group.