this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
151 points (90.4% liked)

Tragedeigh: shitty baby names

158 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I can't surely keep track. I get lost after the Q.

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

2SLGBTQIANBP+ or LGBTQIANB2SP+

  • Two Spirit
  • Lesbian
  • Gay
  • Bisexual
  • Transgender
  • Queer/Questioning
  • Intersex
  • Asexual/Aromantic/Agender (never for allies)
  • Nonbinary
  • Pansexual/Polyamorous
  • Plus (for other identities)
[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

No way in my fucking life I'll be able to remember all of that. I'll need a cheat sheet.

$ cat /dev/random

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

feeding random device into your cat and then string it up is cat abuse /j

[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I guess it's pretty discriminating that some orientations get more letters than others, one even is allowed to have a number and potentially many more have to share just one single +. Why not use only the + for everyone? ♥️

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 weeks ago

This is why most of us just use 'queer' nowadays, even though it's not very accurate in some ways for some people.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Personally think GSRM should be more popular. Its short and includes everyone, and isnt making a a hidden declaration that some minorities are more special by having their own letter (thus the reason for appending more to the alphabet soup)

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks for teaching-me-about/reminding-me-of that acronym.

I've been advocating for the adoption of "people with minority Sexual Orientations and/or Gender Identities" ie "SOGI minorities" or "SOGIm".

I think I still prefer " SOGI minorities" because it's inclusive, and the acronym sort of stands on it's own e.g. I recently learned my province has SOGI curriculum as part of the school system. It's not just about SOGI minorities, it's about helping kids understand what gender is, and isn't.

I do like how GSRM articulates the difference between sexuality and romance though.

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

We believe it was coopted by pedophiles or they tried to claim it for themselves or join in with using it in some way, so sadly there's a lot of baggage which comes with it and why any in the know don't use it.

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's why people should just settle for queer.

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

Queer is slightly contentious in some ways (and we don't mean it having been a slur previously), but yeah, generally better.

How is bryightnleigh supposed to be pronounced? Briton-Lee?

[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

White people have some really bad names. Only a white woman would name her kid khaleesi.

Guy I know worked ers. Kid named Nosmo. The mother looked up, saw the no smoking sign, said that sounds good.

As far as names go it's better than the white ones lmao.

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 weeks ago

[Sincere] Apart from it being a reference and sounding appropriative in some ways what's wrong with Khaleesi?

[–] moody@lemmings.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's fairly common for parents to name their children based on the day they were born, like naming them after the saint that day represents.

I met a guy who's name was the equivalent to "nat-hol" because he was born on the local national holiday and that's what it showed on the calendar for that day.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

These people are naming children like animals.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

To be fair lgb and lgb+ was a lot easier. Its practically doubled over time. Is the Q even needed? I thought queer was a slur.

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's lgbt, not lgb. And queer is a reclaimed slur.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

gotta realize I have experience going back to the 70's. I could be wrong but I swear it was lgb at one point.

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"LGB" may very well have been used to refer to sexual and romantic minorities, but now it's mostly used by transphobes who want to exlude trans people from their own community.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

I mean I was never in the community but it was pretty well represented in communities I was in.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I looked it up and the Q can stand for "queer" or "questioning". I've always assumed it was the second for the exact reason you mentioned. It has been, at least in part, reclaimed, although it probably differs from group to group.