this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
380 points (97.7% liked)

Flippanarchy

1406 readers
1 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

TranscriptA crudely drawn ms-paint-style comic. The first panel depicts a person with an ancap (anarcho capitalist) mask. The mask is black and yellow, the colors are divided diagonally. The person is saying "statist bootlickers fuck off!" to a boot. In the next panel, they are staring at the boot draw an amazon logo on it with a marker. The last panel shows the person deepthroathing the boot, saying "At least it's not the gubermint [government".

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“Whenever anarcho-capitalism is mentioned to me in conversation, it’s usually followed by repealing the age of consent.”

  • SsethTzeentach
[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Capitalist libertarians still want a (mimimal) state, so they can call the cops to protect them and their underage wife

Well, harem. Their underage harem.

They want only the violence the state has to offer.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ancaps are corporate feudalists who want a cool sounding name.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well I guess we now know what kind of idiot starts their manifesto with abandoning any form of morality

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nothing is wrong with capitalism; but the current crony capitalism doesn't provide enough opportunities to be the boot

ancaps in a nutshell

[–] dzsimbo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not sure we will ever find a proper cure for cronyism. The beast is multifaceted. On the most familiar side, we trust our friends better, on the uglier side, you have to sate appetites for them to lend power. I see this as our last big trial towards actual Utopia.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The thing is that crony capitalism is just capitalism. If you are a head on the market, if you have some goose that lays golden eggs, you are going to do everything you can to keep it relevant. Abusing systems or outright harassing your competitors included. By ancaps own selling point, "capitalism works because people purse their selfish interests". I often find ancaps debating this to be like a fundamentalist that found some contradictions in the bible and is working out the apologetics. The bible being good and moral becuase the bible says so is a tautology, and so are their ideas around capitalism.

[–] dzsimbo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

Oh yeah, hands down, no argument on the ancaps. I was just rolling the ball a bit further down the line in my head and couldn't get past 'power corrupts'.

Then I wrote out 3 paragraphs of drivel only to realize that if everyone realizes the agency they have over themselves, the notion of manipulation flies out the window.

Hmh, I think I like it here. A few weeks in and I can already see a clearer path to utopia. Thank you for the inspiration!

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sweet mother of fuck just blatantly desiring/justifying slavery is..wild.

“I dream of a world where I can enslave the poors with no consequence” essentially.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As someone who doesn't believe in morality, I approach this purely in terms of power dynamics and evolutionary fitness rather than "right" or "wrong." If you truly can subjugate people by force of the unprotected (by unprotected I mean not paying a protection subscription) and no one resists, that is, in Darwinian terms, simply a manifestation of natural selection

Tl;dr

everything shpuld be slavery; work or die!

Oh, so you would prefer abolitionists running arouns being mean to you?

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

If they reply, I imagine it will be some hog wash about the NAP (non-aggression principle). Which in short is a honor code they expect everyone to abide (currently not possible because government). It is a rather odd claim for the ancaps I think. They are saying something about solidarity and no one will want to work with an abuser/slaver. They will also deny that Ayn Rand's objectivism is distinct from their ideas, but interrogating them shows its not. So they have an appeal to solidarity, but the selling points of their ideology are selfish motivations. Historically that means there will be plenty who find their selfish interests are to side with an abuser/slaver/colonizer. Id compare them to a religious fundamentalist that just found some contradictions in the bible and is working on the apologetic.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Of course you have no right, he makes a big point about talking about the difference between slavery of the protected (which would be met with aggressive response from the private security they pay for) and slavery of the unprotected (aka poor, and thus are not paying private security to not be enslaved) which is apparently acceptable.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

@boonhet@sopuli.xy

On Reperations

I like to call them the pro oligarch/feudalists that they are. They of course say all kinds of "free market" is not feudalism or pro oligarchy, but then they do all these backflips to defend stolen wealth.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Ah, but is he currently paying for said expensive private security?

[–] Nednarb44@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That last paragraph was a wild read

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

For real. Sometimes its hard to tell if its a 4chan type being edge, but the whole things is a bit too candid to be a troll.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

As if corporate feudalism wasn't cool enough. Sounds cyberpunk as hell

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Even old fashioned anarcho-monarchists are closer to anarchists than ephebophiles. (Please use the correct name for their ideologies)

[–] jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I fuckkng despise how ancaps have completely coopted the term "libertarian" in the US, to the point where they are synonymous to most.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nowadays every time someone says they're a libertarian, I ask them about Mexican immigration. You're not a True Scotsman if you aren't even from Scotland.

There is the kind of old fashioned version whos wrong and crazy but not too much of a bigot and fun as hell if you can put up with how creepy they are.

Most who identify as ephebophiles these days aren't that guy, though.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I don't think true libertarians have good ideas, but its also not unusual that the libertarian party is largely for republicans that are brand aware as they say.