this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
550 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

15822 readers
2013 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 49 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it evaporate in like 5 seconds, then? Also, drainage would be the easiest thing ever. Don't even need a slanted floor.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That'd be awful. You want the stuff in water out of your house, not precipitated all over the floor.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What stuff in water? Are you referring to drainage?

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Minerals, dirt, pathogens, etc.

If you wash your ~~ear~~ raw chicken (you shouldn't), that splatter would be much more evenly spread over every surface it lands on.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Well yeah, I'm not advocating we convert to surface-tensionless water, here. I'm just pointing out the flaw in this meme's logic.

Now on to serious questions, wtf is an ear chicken?

[–] CTDummy@aussie.zone 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Auto correct from raw? Otherwise, god help us.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Yes, I will correct.

[–] Admetus@sopuli.xyz 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like a lot less cleaning in the house as it would just evaporate in less than a minute?

[–] REDACTED 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

High humidity tends to ruin a lot of houses/construction materials over time, but you'll likely first notice random spores

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean you can just ventilate whenever you spill something.

The larger problem would be the entire water-based ecosystem.

[–] Admetus@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

We need xkcd to explain what would happen on a large scale if water was like this.

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You could also clean it by putting a cloth in the lowest point it would run to so this sounds like a win to me

[–] yuri@pawb.social 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

i think without surface tension it would also just fall out of the cloth as soon as you lift it, because nothing would wick against gravity. in fact of your floor is pourous at all, i reckon the water would just immediately all flow further down and you’d be left with a dry floor.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oil doesn’t have surface tension and it stays in the cloth. At a certain point it’s not surface tension that keeps liquids together but friction.

Says my uneducated ass.

[–] yuri@pawb.social 4 points 2 days ago

oils have low surface tension, i believe a true no-surface tension liquid is as impossible as a true frictionless surface.

i didn’t consider friction though! i think the rag would still dry out completely pretty quick, but you might have a few seconds while the water falls out depending on how tight the mesh is?

i dunno, this is a real whacky thing to think about!

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Without surface tension it would stick to whatever thing attracts it more. And a normal piece of cloth attracts water way more than a normal non-carpet floor.

But it also wouldn't flow freely as the GP expects either. Some oils have almost no surface tension, and they are famously a nightmare to clean up.

As a positive, the water would evaporate faster.

[–] yuri@pawb.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the cloth attracts it because of the capillary action pulling water into the gaps therein, and capillary action relies on surface tension! i think without outside forces like suction, the liquid in this scenario would never flow against gravity.

i think hahah

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Surface tension doesn't tell you anything about the cloth-water interface.

[–] yuri@pawb.social 1 points 2 hours ago

late reply but i ONLY JUST CONSIDERED, the cloth would most likely have some static charge which WOULD result in a literal “attraction force” towards the water!

physics is so stupid, i love it so much

[–] yuri@pawb.social 2 points 2 days ago

i mean it’s literally why liquids wick into cloth

[–] monk@lemmy.unboiled.info 7 points 2 days ago

good news: it wouldn't be

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Your floor would have to be supernaturally flat and level for that to happen.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the world is crooked ! reality is a lie !

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lambs to the cosmic slaughter!

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 3 points 2 days ago

ah yes ! that's the one

[–] schnokobaer@feddit.org 21 points 2 days ago

But that 2 micron puddle would also evaporate in 2 microseconds!

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We would probably just not exist as liquids that want to hold together are pretty essential. Even if you just imagine blood not leaving your body through the tiniest nick.

[–] Psionicsickness@reddthat.com 6 points 2 days ago

I mean maybe? Surface tension play a role in blood staying on the wound, but it’s the blood itself that clots. I think the bigger issue would be your eyes, but maybe evolution creates a light sensor that wasn’t developed underwater…

I’m at a loss. In my heart of hearts I know we all die if water doesn’t tend to hold together, but I can’t think of WHY. Call xkcd.

[–] Gwaer@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Wouldn’t it just be a superfluid at that point? Those things are ungovernable. We’d have way more problems that just spilled puddles. They crawl out of the beakers on their own. It’d be an absolute nightmare.

My bad superfluids are 0 viscosity not surface tension carry on we’re safe.

[–] judgyweevil@feddit.it 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's how water works in videogames

[–] vonxylofon@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] judgyweevil@feddit.it 5 points 2 days ago

Water just doesn't work in minecraft

[–] loomy@lemy.lol 2 points 2 days ago
[–] sxan@midwest.social 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Would capillary action still work, or does it depend on surface tension? I'm thinking about superfluids. Would the water stop at covering the floor?

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can try it yourself by adding a drop of dish soap to some water. Capillary action would still work and the water would evaporate long before covering the entire floor.

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Capillary rise depends on surface tension, gamma. If surface tension was 0, there would be no capillary rise. Soap decreases surface tension, but it's not 0.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

Oh nevermind then. I just looked it up and came across the so-called Rollin film. I don't know if that only appears in helium or if superfluid water would be subject to that effect as well. I wonder how that would impact its behaviour.

[–] PillowD@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 4 points 2 days ago

Probably our bodies would instantly collapse into ooze like that guy in the first X-Men.

[–] 58008@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

What if each H~2~O molecule was coated in a hydrophobic substance?